Skip to main content

Challenges to prison time credits

Maxwell v. Dinis

Updated Nov 4, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Awaiting Decision

Decision likely Jan–Apr 2027

What it’s about
William Maxwell, a federal prisoner, challenges the Bureau of Prisons’ calculation of earned time credits under the First Step Act, which he says could make him eligible for earlier transfer to a halfway house or home confinement.
What's at stake
The case could determine how federal inmates challenge time-credit calculations that may affect when they can leave prison for a halfway house or home confinement.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for William Maxwell v. Sandra Dinis, Acting Warden
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court will decide whether he may bring that challenge through a federal habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The dispute concerns how courts review the federal government's application of First Step Act credits for people seeking earlier transfer to community-based custody.

Question presented

Whether a claim regarding application of time credits under the First Step Act of 2018, 132 Stat. 5195-5208 (codified in relevant part at 18 U. S. C. §§3631–3635), seeking accelerated transfer to a halfway house or home confinement, can be brought in a habeas petition under 28 U. S. C. §2241.

What happens next

Likely Jan–Apr 2027

The Court heard argument on November 2, 2026. Nearly all opinions are released by the end of the term in late June or early July 2027.

Half of cases argued in November land between 84 and 170 days, with a median of 119 — from 169 merits cases since 1995.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.

Argument and decision days

At argument

Oral argument is scheduled for November 2, 2026. The parties will address whether a dispute over First Step Act credits and earlier community placement belongs in a Section 2241 habeas petition.

Why it matters

For example, an inmate who believes earned credits were miscalculated could gain or lose a path to earlier community placement.

Documents

3

Docket activity

29
  • Case data updated: title

    Nov 4, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: title

    Nov 4, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: title, status

    Nov 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: title, status

    Nov 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: status

    Nov 2, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • Argued. For petitioner: Masha G. Hansford, Washington, D. C. For respondent supporting vacatur: Kevin J. Barber, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of judgment below: Brian W. Barnes, Washington, D. C.

    Nov 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • New document added

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 23, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is at stake in Maxwell v. Dinis?
The Court will consider whether an inmate may use a Section 2241 habeas petition to challenge First Step Act credit calculations.
How could Maxwell v. Dinis affect federal inmates?
It could affect whether inmates can ask federal courts to review credit calculations tied to earlier halfway-house or home-confinement placement.
When is oral argument in Maxwell v. Dinis?
Oral argument is scheduled for November 2, 2026, with a decision potentially following later in the same term.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 2, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis