Skip to main content

No. 25-767October Term 2025Decided May 26, 2026

Docket 25-767October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Daren K. Margolin, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review v. National Association of Immigration Judges

The Supreme Court resolved the dispute over the Fourth Circuit's remand concerning the proper path for reviewing the immigration judges' challenge.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 26, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 26, 2026
What it's about

Whether the court of appeals properly remanded to the district court to consider in the first instance whether post-argument developments undermine core features of the CSRA that justified the inference that Congress intended to withdraw district-court jurisdiction over claims that fall within the statute’s ambit.

Question presented

Whether the court of appeals properly remanded to the district court to consider in the first instance whether post-argument developments undermine core features of the CSRA that justified the inference that Congress intended to withdraw district-court jurisdiction over claims that fall within the statute’s ambit.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released May 26, 2026

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

An association of immigration judges challenged an Executive Office for Immigration Review policy regulating judges' work-related speech. The Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision on whether the Fourth Circuit properly sent the case back to a district court to examine later developments affecting the Civil Service Reform Act review system.

Vote

The Court issued a per curiam decision on May 26, 2026.

Impact

The case concerns whether immigration judges challenging an employment policy can begin in federal district court or must use the Civil Service Reform Act's administrative review process. That choice affects judges covered by the policy and how quickly they can seek review.

What's next

The Court has finished this docket action. The parties and lower courts will take any steps required to carry out the Court's decision.

What did the Supreme Court decide in Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges?

The Court issued a per curiam decision addressing whether the Fourth Circuit properly remanded the case for further review of the Civil Service Reform Act process.

Who is affected by the immigration judges' speech-policy case?

Immigration judges covered by the Executive Office for Immigration Review policy are directly affected. The case concerns where their association may challenge work-related speech restrictions.

What happens next after Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges?

The Supreme Court has completed its docket action. The parties and lower courts will carry out any further proceedings required by the decision.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court resolved the dispute over the Fourth Circuit's remand concerning the proper path for reviewing the immigration judges' challenge.

Impact

The case concerns whether immigration judges challenging an employment policy can begin in federal district court or must use the Civil Service Reform Act's administrative review process. That choice affects judges covered by the policy and how quickly they can seek review.

Not official Court text.

Timing

Decided May 26, 2026

The Court released its decision on May 26, 2026 without hearing oral argument.