No. 25-767October Term 2025Decided May 26, 2026
Daren K. Margolin, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review v. National Association of Immigration Judges
The Supreme Court resolved the dispute over the Fourth Circuit's remand concerning the proper path for reviewing the immigration judges' challenge.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released May 26, 2026
- What it's about
Whether the court of appeals properly remanded to the district court to consider in the first instance whether post-argument developments undermine core features of the CSRA that justified the inference that Congress intended to withdraw district-court jurisdiction over claims that fall within the statute’s ambit.
Question presented
Whether the court of appeals properly remanded to the district court to consider in the first instance whether post-argument developments undermine core features of the CSRA that justified the inference that Congress intended to withdraw district-court jurisdiction over claims that fall within the statute’s ambit.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released May 26, 2026
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
An association of immigration judges challenged an Executive Office for Immigration Review policy regulating judges' work-related speech. The Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision on whether the Fourth Circuit properly sent the case back to a district court to examine later developments affecting the Civil Service Reform Act review system.
Vote
The Court issued a per curiam decision on May 26, 2026.
Impact
The case concerns whether immigration judges challenging an employment policy can begin in federal district court or must use the Civil Service Reform Act's administrative review process. That choice affects judges covered by the policy and how quickly they can seek review.
What's next
The Court has finished this docket action. The parties and lower courts will take any steps required to carry out the Court's decision.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges?
The Court issued a per curiam decision addressing whether the Fourth Circuit properly remanded the case for further review of the Civil Service Reform Act process.
Who is affected by the immigration judges' speech-policy case?
Immigration judges covered by the Executive Office for Immigration Review policy are directly affected. The case concerns where their association may challenge work-related speech restrictions.
What happens next after Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges?
The Supreme Court has completed its docket action. The parties and lower courts will carry out any further proceedings required by the decision.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Supreme Court resolved the dispute over the Fourth Circuit's remand concerning the proper path for reviewing the immigration judges' challenge.
Impact
The case concerns whether immigration judges challenging an employment policy can begin in federal district court or must use the Civil Service Reform Act's administrative review process. That choice affects judges covered by the policy and how quickly they can seek review.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Timing
Decided May 26, 2026
The Court released its decision on May 26, 2026 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials7
Supreme Court docket 25-767
docket | Sep 2, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Sep 2, 2026
Opinion of the Court - Per Curiam
opinion | May 26, 2026
Petition
brief | Dec 23, 2025
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026