No. 25-332October Term 2025Decided Jun 29, 2026
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. Rebecca Kelly Slaughter
The Court put the FTC under stronger presidential control by invalidating the commissioners' for-cause removal protections.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 29, 2026
- What it's about
from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Question presented
Do the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Jun 29, 2026
- Area
Administrative Law, Immigration
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court said the federal law that protects FTC commissioners from being fired except for cause violates the separation of powers. That removes the old legal barrier to a president firing an FTC commissioner without proving cause.
Impact
The ruling gives the White House more direct control over the FTC, which oversees competition and consumer protection. For example, an FTC commissioner who opposes a president's agenda no longer has the same statutory job protection.
What's next
The case now goes back to lower courts to carry out the Supreme Court's decision. The FTC, the White House, and affected commissioners must now operate under the new removal rule.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Trump v. Slaughter?
The Court said the FTC's for-cause firing protections are unconstitutional, so the President can remove commissioners without meeting that statutory standard.
Who is affected by the Trump v. Slaughter decision?
FTC commissioners lose a key job protection, and the White House gains more control over the agency's leadership and policy direction.
What happens next after Trump v. Slaughter?
The case goes back to lower courts to implement the ruling. The FTC and the President now must act under the new removal rule.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court put the FTC under stronger presidential control by invalidating the commissioners' for-cause removal protections.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
FTC commissioners are directly affected because their seven-year terms had removal limits. Here, President Trump fired Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya without citing statutory cause (a legally required reason). Because the FTC has vast powers, people and businesses can feel leadership changes. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded (sent the case back for more proceedings). Next disputes may test presidential control over FTC leaders and courts’ power to restore removed officials.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Timing
Decided June 29, 2026
The Court released its decision 203 days after oral argument on December 8, 2025. The median for cases argued in December is 148 days.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Aug 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials12
Supreme Court docket 25-332
docket | Aug 14, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Aug 14, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
Opinion of the Court - R
opinion | Jun 29, 2026
Oral Arguments - Trump
audio | Dec 8, 2025
Oral Arguments - Slaughter
audio | Dec 8, 2025
Opinion
opinion | Sep 22, 2025
Reply
brief | Sep 16, 2025
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Sep 4, 2025
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Aug 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Aug 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Aug 2, 2026