No. 25-7318October Term 2025Petition Pending
Terrence Temple, Petitioner v. Illinois
Terrence Temple has asked the Supreme Court to review a decision by the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District.
Case status
- Current stage
- Petition Pending
- Latest event
- Petition pending
- Decision timing
- No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
- What it's about
Terrence Temple has asked the Supreme Court to review a decision by the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. The Court has not yet decided whether to hear the case.
Question presented
Whether a state restriction on carrying loaded, unsecured firearms in public parks is facially constitutional under the Second Amendment?
- Case path
Appellate Court of Illinois, First District / Petition pending
- Area
Gun Rights
Briefing
What it's about
Terrence Temple has asked the Supreme Court to review an Illinois appellate-court decision involving a state restriction on carrying loaded, unsecured firearms in public parks. The question is whether that restriction is unconstitutional in all of its applications under the Second Amendment.
Argument
The case has not been scheduled for oral argument. Temple's petition asks the Court to decide whether Illinois' park restriction is facially constitutional under the Second Amendment.
Impact
The case could affect people who carry firearms in Illinois public parks and the officials who enforce park firearm rules. For example, it could shape whether a person may carry a loaded, unsecured gun while visiting a public park.
What is at stake in Temple v. Illinois?
The case concerns whether Illinois may restrict loaded, unsecured firearms in public parks under the Second Amendment.
Who could be affected by the Illinois public-park firearm rule?
People carrying firearms in Illinois public parks and officials enforcing park rules could be affected by the Court's decision whether to take the case.
What happens next in Temple v. Illinois?
The Court will decide whether to hear the petition or take another scheduling step. Oral argument has not been scheduled.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Method
- Methodology