No. 24-5774October Term 2025Decided Jan 14, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026
Barrett v. United States
Dwayne Barrett, Petitioner v. United States
For one act covered by both firearm provisions, the federal government may obtain only one conviction.
Case status
Decided 9-0 · January 14, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Jackson
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jan 14, 2026
- Argued alongside
- What it's about
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress did not authorize convictions under both 18 U.S.C. §§924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j) for a single act that violates both provisions. A person who uses a firearm in a crime of violence that results in death faces one conviction, not two. Justice Jackson wrote for the 9-0 Court.
Question presented
May a defendant who commits a single act that violates two statutory provisions be convicted under both provisions?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit / Decision released Jan 14, 2026
- Area
Criminal Procedure, Gun Rights
Decision
What the Court decided
For one act covered by both firearm provisions, the federal government may obtain only one conviction.
Impact
People prosecuted for a firearm-related federal crime that causes death are affected. They may receive only one conviction, rather than convictions under both provisions. For example, one gun use during a qualifying crime causing death cannot produce both convictions. The ruling reverses the Second Circuit in part and resolves a division among federal appeals courts. Prosecutors must choose between these provisions when one act violates both.
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 9-0
- Majority author
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The Court decided that Congress did not allow two convictions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j) when one firearm-related act violates both provisions. A person whose use of a firearm during a violent crime results in death faces one conviction, not two.
Vote
Justice Jackson wrote the 9–0 opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett; Justice Gorsuch concurred.
Justice Jackson wrote for a unanimous 9-0 Court.
“Congress did not authorize convictions under both provisions for a single act that violates both.”
Impact
The decision prevents duplicate convictions for the same firearm-related act under these two provisions. It affects defendants sentenced under both sections for one act, as well as prosecutors and courts handling similar cases.
What's next
Lower courts must apply the decision in future cases involving these two provisions. Parties with two convictions for a single act may seek review consistent with the Court's decision.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Barrett v. United States?
The Court said one act cannot produce convictions under both 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j).
Who is affected by the Barrett decision?
Defendants charged under both provisions for one firearm-related act are affected. Federal prosecutors and lower courts must also follow the decision.
What happens next after Barrett v. United States?
Lower courts must use the Court's rule in similar cases. Affected parties may ask courts to review duplicate convictions.
Timing
Decided January 14, 2026
The Court released its decision 99 days after oral argument on October 7, 2025. The median for cases argued in October is 139 days.
Documents
Opinions
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Audio
Key filings
Briefs on file: 14View on supremecourt.gov
Activity
Docket activity8
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
Opinion added: opinion
Jan 14, 2026 | Court records
Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - KJ
Jan 14, 2026 | Court records
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Barrett
Oct 7, 2025 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Oct 15, 2024 | Court records
Brief added: Questions Presented
Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 24-5774
docket | Sep 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Sep 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
Opinion
opinion | Jan 14, 2026
Opinion of the Court (Ketanji Brown Jackson)
opinion | Jan 14, 2026
Oral argument
audio | Oct 7, 2025
Petition
brief | Oct 15, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026