Skip to main content
Docket 24-1046October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Jason Wolford, et al., Petitioners v. Anne E. Lopez, Attorney General of Hawaii

The Court is considering a civil rights case about the standard for qualified immunity when law enforcement officers use force during an arrest.

Case status

Current stage
Awaiting Decision
Latest event
Argued Jan 20, 2026
Decision timing
Expected by late June or early July of the Court term unless the Court orders otherwise.
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardJan 20, 2026
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

The Court is considering a civil rights case about the standard for qualified immunity when law enforcement officers use force during an arrest. The case addresses how courts evaluate excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment.

Question presented

Does a law that makes it a crime for a licensed concealed carry permit holder to bring a handgun onto private property open to the public—such as a store or restaurant—unless the property owner gives “express authorization” violate the Second Amendment?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Argued Jan 20, 2026

Area

Gun Rights, Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court heard argument in a Second Amendment case about a Hawaii law. The law makes it a crime for a licensed concealed-carry permit holder to bring a handgun onto private property open to the public, like a store or restaurant, unless the owner gives express authorization.

Argument

The Court heard argument on January 20, 2026, on whether Hawaii's express-authorization rule for licensed concealed-carry holders violates the Second Amendment.

Impact

The case could affect where licensed gun owners may legally carry in everyday places open to the public. For example, it matters to a permit holder who wants to enter a restaurant or shop while carrying a handgun.

What is the core dispute in this case?

The justices are reviewing whether Hawaii may criminalize carrying a handgun into stores and restaurants unless the owner gives express permission. The challenge focuses on the Second Amendment.

Who could feel the effects of the Court's eventual decision?

Licensed concealed-carry permit holders, business owners, and customers could all be affected. The answer could shape gun-carry rules in everyday public-facing private spaces.

What happens next procedurally in this case?

The justices have already heard argument. The next major step is the Court's written decision, which is generally expected by late June or early July.