Skip to main content

No. 25-6430October Term 2025DismissedUpdated Sep 5, 2026

Docket 25-6430October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Jesse Michael Holliday v. California

Jesse Michael Holliday, Petitioner v. California

Jesse Michael Holliday petitioned the Supreme Court alleging that sheriff’s deputies assaulted him before trial under judicial authority and that the California courts failed to provide protection or review of the alleged misconduct.

Case status

Current stage
Dismissed
Latest event
Dismissed
Next
Argument not yet scheduledArgument expected next term.
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision Released
What it's about

Jesse Michael Holliday petitioned the Supreme Court alleging that sheriff’s deputies assaulted him before trial under judicial authority and that the California courts failed to provide protection or review of the alleged misconduct. The Supreme Court dismissed the case without resolving those constitutional claims.

Question presented

1. Whether the due process rights of the petitioner were violated when he was subjected to multiple pretrial assaults/batteries/maiming by deputies acting under color of judicial authority, without redress or protection from the trial court? 2. Whether a judge who authorized or ordered multiple violent assaults on a pretrial detainee by sheriffs deputies forfeits jurisdiction to proceed over that defendant’s criminal case, or to command a separate Judge to perform in His place? 3. Whether the refusal of state courts to review overwhelming evidence of judicial misconduct and unconstitutional treatment of a pretrial detainee constitutes a denial of due process and equal protection under state and Federal Laws?

Case path

Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District / Dismissed

Area

Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

Jesse Michael Holliday alleged that sheriff’s deputies assaulted him before trial under judicial authority and that California courts failed to protect him or review the alleged misconduct. The Supreme Court dismissed the case without resolving those constitutional claims.

Impact

The case concerns what protections pretrial detainees have when they allege abuse by law enforcement and misconduct by judges. It could matter to a jailed person who says court officials ignored alleged violence before trial.

What's next

No oral argument or decision window is scheduled. Watch for any further scheduling move from the Court.

What is at stake in Holliday v. California?

Holliday alleged that deputies assaulted him before trial under judicial authority and that California courts did not address the alleged misconduct.

Who could be affected by this case?

Pretrial detainees alleging abuse by deputies or judicial misconduct could be affected by how courts address claims of constitutional protections.

What happens next in Holliday v. California?

The case is dismissed. No oral argument or decision window is scheduled.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Dec 31, 2024 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 5, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3