Skip to main content
Docket 24-43October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson

A 14-year-old transgender girl seeks to compete on her school's girls' sports teams despite West Virginia's ban on transgender athletes in girls' sports.

Case status

Current stage
Awaiting Decision
Latest event
Argued Jan 13, 2026
Decision timing
Expected by late June or early July of the Court term unless the Court orders otherwise.
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardJan 13, 2026
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

A 14-year-old transgender girl seeks to compete on her school's girls' sports teams despite West Virginia's ban on transgender athletes in girls' sports. The case tests whether state laws restricting sports participation based on sex assigned at birth violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX.

Question presented

Does Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause prohibit a state from assigning students to girls’ and boys’ sports teams based on their biological sex as determined at birth?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Argued Jan 13, 2026

Area

Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a fight over whether West Virginia can require students to join girls’ and boys’ school sports teams based on their biological sex as determined at birth. The case comes from a challenge by a 14-year-old transgender girl who wants to play on her school’s girls’ teams despite the state’s ban.

Argument

The Court heard argument on Jan. 13, 2026, on whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause allow or prohibit states from assigning school sports teams based on sex determined at birth.

Impact

The case could affect school sports rules for students across the country. For example, it may shape whether transgender girls can join girls’ teams in states with laws like West Virginia’s.

What is the core dispute in West Virginia v. B. P. J.?

The case asks whether Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause bars a state from assigning school sports teams by biological sex at birth. It arises from West Virginia’s ban on transgender athletes in girls’ sports.

Who could feel the real-world effects of this case?

Students, families, schools, and athletic programs could all be affected. The decision may influence participation rules for transgender students in school sports nationwide.

What happens next after the Court heard arguments?

The justices will consider the case and issue an opinion later. The prompt says a decision is generally expected by late June or early July of the term.