West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson
A 14-year-old transgender girl seeks to compete on her school's girls' sports teams despite West Virginia's ban on transgender athletes in girls' sports.
Case status
- Current stage
- Awaiting Decision
- Latest event
- Argued Jan 13, 2026
- Decision timing
- Expected by late June or early July of the Court term unless the Court orders otherwise.
- What it's about
A 14-year-old transgender girl seeks to compete on her school's girls' sports teams despite West Virginia's ban on transgender athletes in girls' sports. The case tests whether state laws restricting sports participation based on sex assigned at birth violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX.
Question presented
Does Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause prohibit a state from assigning students to girls’ and boys’ sports teams based on their biological sex as determined at birth?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Argued Jan 13, 2026
- Area
Civil Rights
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a fight over whether West Virginia can require students to join girls’ and boys’ school sports teams based on their biological sex as determined at birth. The case comes from a challenge by a 14-year-old transgender girl who wants to play on her school’s girls’ teams despite the state’s ban.
Argument
The Court heard argument on Jan. 13, 2026, on whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause allow or prohibit states from assigning school sports teams based on sex determined at birth.
Impact
The case could affect school sports rules for students across the country. For example, it may shape whether transgender girls can join girls’ teams in states with laws like West Virginia’s.
What is the core dispute in West Virginia v. B. P. J.?
The case asks whether Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause bars a state from assigning school sports teams by biological sex at birth. It arises from West Virginia’s ban on transgender athletes in girls’ sports.
Who could feel the real-world effects of this case?
Students, families, schools, and athletic programs could all be affected. The decision may influence participation rules for transgender students in school sports nationwide.
What happens next after the Court heard arguments?
The justices will consider the case and issue an opinion later. The prompt says a decision is generally expected by late June or early July of the term.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jun 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 24-43
docket | Jun 5, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jun 5, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
Oral Arguments - West Virginia v. B. P. J.
audio | Jan 13, 2026
Petition
brief | Jul 11, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026