Skip to main content

No. 25-1184October Term 2025DismissedUpdated Sep 1, 2026

Docket 25-1184October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Angela W. DeBose v. Florida Polytechnic University Board of Trustees

This dismissed petition challenged Florida court orders requiring Angela W.

Case status

Current stage
Dismissed
Latest event
Dismissed
Next
Argument not yet scheduledArgument expected next term.
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision Released
What it's about

This dismissed petition challenged Florida court orders requiring Angela W. DeBose, a self-represented litigant, to post a $1 million security bond to continue a civil case. It also challenged the Florida appellate system’s use of unexplained decisions, arguing that they prevented meaningful review of potentially invalid lower-court orders.

Question presented

1. Whether the State of Florida violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by imposing a prohibitive $1,000,000.00 security bond as a condition for a pro se litigant to maintain a civil action, thereby creating an insurmountable financial barrier to court access. See Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971). 2. Whether a state appellate system violates the Fourteenth Amendment when it utilizes unelaborated decisions to insulate potentially void lower court orders from meaningful judicial review, effectively creating a jurisdictional void for litigants. See Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422 (1982).

Case path

Supreme Court of Florida / Dismissed

Area

Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

Angela W. DeBose petitioned the Supreme Court after proceedings in the Supreme Court of Florida. She questions whether a $1 million security bond for a self-represented civil litigant and unexplained appellate decisions violate Fourteenth Amendment protections.

Argument

A petition for certiorari (a request that the Supreme Court hear the case) was filed, but oral argument has not been scheduled. No substantive justice or advocate reactions are available yet.

Impact

The case raises whether a person who cannot afford a large bond can keep a civil case in court. It also concerns whether litigants can receive meaningful appellate review when an appellate court gives no explanation for its decision.

What's next

Watch for the Court to schedule oral argument or take another scheduling action. No decision window is available yet.

What is at stake in DeBose v. Florida Polytechnic University Board of Trustees?

The petition asks whether a $1 million security bond can unlawfully prevent a self-represented person from maintaining a civil case.

Who could be affected by the $1 million bond question?

Self-represented civil litigants who cannot afford a large security bond could be affected if such a requirement blocks access to court.

What happens next in DeBose v. Florida Polytechnic University Board of Trustees?

The Court may make another scheduling move or schedule oral argument. No decision timing is available yet.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Mar 19, 2026 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 1, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3