Skip to main content

No. 25-1019October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-1019October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Warren Petersen, President of the Arizona Senate, et al., Petitioners v. Mi Familia Vota, et al.

Arizona legislative leaders ask the Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision that blocked parts of Arizona’s voter-registration and mail-voting rules requiring documentary proof of citizenship or residence.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Arizona legislative leaders ask the Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision that blocked parts of Arizona’s voter-registration and mail-voting rules requiring documentary proof of citizenship or residence. The case also concerns the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that a related Arizona law directing election officials to check databases for potentially ineligible voters was enacted with intentional discrimination.

Question presented

1. Does the National Voter Registration Act or a federal consent decree prohibit Arizona from requiring voter-registration applicants to produce “satisfactory evidence” of U. S. citizenship when registering with a state registration form? 2. Does the National Voter Registration Act prohibit Arizona from implementing a program within 90 days of a federal election to cancel the registrations of voters who are not U. S. citizens?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Elections, Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

Arizona legislative leaders ask the Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision blocking parts of the state's voter-registration and mail-voting rules. The dispute centers on whether federal voter-registration law or a prior consent decree (a court-approved agreement) prevents Arizona from requiring proof of citizenship on its state registration form and from canceling some registrations close to a federal election.

Argument

The petition has not been scheduled for oral argument. Arizona legislative leaders seek review of the Ninth Circuit's decision, while the questions ask whether federal law and a consent decree limit the state's requirements and its planned registration-cancellation program.

Impact

The case could affect applicants who use Arizona's state registration form, including people asked to provide documents proving citizenship or residence. It also concerns whether voters without proof of citizenship may vote by mail and how election officials check for possible noncitizens.

What is at stake in Petersen v. Mi Familia Vota?

The case concerns Arizona's power to require citizenship and residence documents for its state voter-registration form. It also concerns a program to cancel registrations of noncitizens near federal elections.

Who could be affected by Arizona's voter-registration rules?

Applicants using Arizona's state registration form could be asked for proof of citizenship or residence. Voters without citizenship proof may also be affected by mail-voting restrictions.

When will the Supreme Court act in Petersen v. Mi Familia Vota?

No oral argument is scheduled, and no decision window is set. The next step is likely a Court action on whether to hear the case or a scheduling move.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3