No. 19-267October Term 2019Decided Jul 8, 2020Updated Sep 3, 2026
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru
Teachers who perform important religious functions for a religious school can be treated as ministers for First Amendment purposes, even without formal titles or extensive religious training.
Case status
Decided 7-2 · July 8, 2020 · Opinion by Justice Alito
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jul 8, 2020
- What it's about
This case asked whether teachers at Catholic elementary schools who taught religion and led students in religious activities count as “ministers” for First Amendment purposes, even if they did not have formal ministerial titles or extensive religious training. The dispute arose after two teachers sued their schools for employment discrimination and the schools argued that the Constitution bars courts from reviewing those claims.
Question presented
Whether the Religion Clauses prevent civil courts from adjudicating employment discrimination claims brought by an employee against her religious employer, where the employee carried out important religious functions?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jul 8, 2020
- Area
First Amendment, Civil Rights
Decision
What the Court decided
Teachers who perform important religious functions for a religious school can be treated as ministers for First Amendment purposes, even without formal titles or extensive religious training.
Impact
Religious schools may have greater control over employment decisions involving teachers who carry out key religious duties. For example, a teacher who leads students in prayer and teaches religion may not be able to bring a discrimination claim in civil court.
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 7-2
- Majority author
- Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Majority
- Samuel A. Alito, Jr.(author)
- John G. Roberts, Jr.
- Neil Gorsuch
- Brett M. Kavanaugh
- Elena Kagan
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Clarence Thomas(concurring, author)
Dissenting
- Sonia Sotomayor(author)
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The Court decided that the Religion Clauses bar civil courts from hearing employment-discrimination claims involving religious-school employees who perform important religious functions. The case involved Catholic elementary-school teachers who taught religion and led religious activities.
Vote
Impact
Religious schools may have greater control over employment decisions involving teachers who carry out key religious duties. For example, a teacher who leads students in prayer and teaches religion may not be able to bring a discrimination claim in civil court.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this case. The decision guides lower courts and religious schools in similar employment-discrimination disputes.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru?
The Court said civil courts cannot hear employment-discrimination claims involving religious-school employees who perform important religious functions.
Who is affected by the Our Lady of Guadalupe School decision?
Religious schools and employees who teach religion or lead religious activities are directly affected. The decision can limit some discrimination lawsuits against those schools.
What happens next after Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru?
The Supreme Court has completed the case. Lower courts must apply the decision in similar disputes involving religious employers and employees.
Timing
Decided July 8, 2020
The Court released its decision on July 8, 2020 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Activity
Docket activity4
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 3, 2026 | Generated
Brief added: Questions Presented
May 23, 2026 | Court records
Opinion added: opinion
Jul 8, 2020 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Aug 28, 2019 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 19-267
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 25, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 23, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Jul 8, 2020
Petition
brief | Aug 28, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 3, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 3, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 3, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 3, 2026