Skip to main content

No. 19-267October Term 2019Decided Jul 8, 2020Updated Sep 3, 2026

Docket 19-267October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru

Teachers who perform important religious functions for a religious school can be treated as ministers for First Amendment purposes, even without formal titles or extensive religious training.

Case status

Decided 7-2 · July 8, 2020 · Opinion by Justice Alito

Dissenting

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jul 8, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJul 8, 2020
What it's about

This case asked whether teachers at Catholic elementary schools who taught religion and led students in religious activities count as “ministers” for First Amendment purposes, even if they did not have formal ministerial titles or extensive religious training. The dispute arose after two teachers sued their schools for employment discrimination and the schools argued that the Constitution bars courts from reviewing those claims.

Question presented

Whether the Religion Clauses prevent civil courts from adjudicating employment discrimination claims brought by an employee against her religious employer, where the employee carried out important religious functions?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jul 8, 2020

Area

First Amendment, Civil Rights

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

Teachers who perform important religious functions for a religious school can be treated as ministers for First Amendment purposes, even without formal titles or extensive religious training.

Impact

Religious schools may have greater control over employment decisions involving teachers who carry out key religious duties. For example, a teacher who leads students in prayer and teaches religion may not be able to bring a discrimination claim in civil court.

Not official Court text.

Vote

Vote split
7-2
Majority author
Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

Dissenting

Opinion documents

Briefing

What it's about

The Court decided that the Religion Clauses bar civil courts from hearing employment-discrimination claims involving religious-school employees who perform important religious functions. The case involved Catholic elementary-school teachers who taught religion and led religious activities.

Vote

Justice Alito wrote the 7–2 opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Kagan, and Breyer; Justice Thomas concurred; Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg dissented.

Impact

Religious schools may have greater control over employment decisions involving teachers who carry out key religious duties. For example, a teacher who leads students in prayer and teaches religion may not be able to bring a discrimination claim in civil court.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this case. The decision guides lower courts and religious schools in similar employment-discrimination disputes.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru?

The Court said civil courts cannot hear employment-discrimination claims involving religious-school employees who perform important religious functions.

Who is affected by the Our Lady of Guadalupe School decision?

Religious schools and employees who teach religion or lead religious activities are directly affected. The decision can limit some discrimination lawsuits against those schools.

What happens next after Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru?

The Supreme Court has completed the case. Lower courts must apply the decision in similar disputes involving religious employers and employees.

Timing

Decided July 8, 2020

The Court released its decision on July 8, 2020 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity4
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 3, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    May 23, 2026 | Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jul 8, 2020 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 28, 2019 | Court records