Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

January 2025 oral arguments

10 cases across 6 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Six argument days, January 10 to January 22, 2025. Four of them have more than one case.

1 case
TikTok Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney GeneralDoes the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to TikTok, violate the First Amendment?Decided 24-656

2 cases
Tony R. Hewitt, Petitioner v. United StatesDoes the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provision apply to a defendant whose original sentence was imposed before the Act’s enactment, but was later vacated and resentenced after the Act took effect?Decided 23-1002Karyn D. Stanley, Petitioner v. City of Sanford, FloridaUnder the Americans with Disabilities Act, does a former employee-who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed-lose her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job?Decided 23-997

2 cases
Patrick D. Thompson, Petitioner v. United StatesDoes the prohibition in 18 U.S.C. § 1014 on making a “false statement” for the purposes of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies include making statements that are misleading but not false?Decided 23-1095Gary Waetzig, Petitioner v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Is a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule 60(b)?Decided 23-971

1 case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of TexasIs a Texas law that requires any website that publishes content one-third or more of which is “harmful to minors” to verify the age of each of its users before providing access subject to “rational basis” review or “strict scrutiny”?Decided 23-1122

2 cases
Food and Drug Administration, et al., Petitioners v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., et al.Can retailers who would sell a new tobacco product seek judicial review of the FDA’s denial of a manufacturer’s marketing application under the Tobacco Control Act?Decided 23-1187McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc., Petitioner v. McKesson Corporation, et al.Does the Hobbs Act require a federal district court to accept the Federal Communication Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act?Decided 23-1226

2 cases
Casey Cunningham, et al., Petitioners v. Cornell University, et al.Can a plaintiff state a claim under ERISA’s provision prohibiting a plan fiduciary from knowingly engaging in transactions with barred parties, solely by alleging that such a transaction took place?Decided 23-1007Janice Hughes Barnes, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ashtian Barnes, Deceased, Petitioner v. Roberto Felix, Jr., et al.Should courts apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment?Decided 23-1239