Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

January 2024 oral arguments

9 cases across 5 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Five argument days, January 8 to January 17, 2024. Four of them have more than one case.

2 cases
FBI v. FikreAre respondent’s claims challenging his placement on the No Fly List moot, given that he was removed from the No Fly List in 2016 and the government provided a sworn declaration stating that he “will not be placed on the No Fly List in the future based on the currently available information”?Decided 22-1178Campos-Chaves v. GarlandDoes the government provide adequate notice under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) when it serves an initial notice document that does not include the “time and place” of proceedings followed by an additional document containing that information?Decided 22-674

2 cases
Sheetz v. El Dorado CountyIs a monetary exaction imposed by a local government as a condition for a building permit exempt from the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” requirements established in Nollan v. Cal. Coastal Comm’n and Dolan v. City of Tigard , simply because the exaction is authorized by local legislation?Decided 22-1074United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLCMust the U.S. Trustee issue refunds for the extra fees paid by debtors in certain districts to address the lack of uniformity identified in Siegel v. Fitzgerald ?Decided 22-1238

1 case
Smith v. ArizonaDoes the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permit the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst?Decided 22-899

2 cases
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L. P.May a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K support a private claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement?Decided 22-1165DeVillier v. TexasMay a party sue a state directly under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment?Decided 22-913

2 cases
Relentless, Inc. v. Dept. of Commerce1. Should Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council be overruled? 2. Does statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency?Decided 22-1219Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo1. Does the Magnuson-Stevens Act authorize the National Marine Fisheries Service to promulgate a rule that would require industry to pay for at-sea monitoring programs? 2. Should the Court overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council or at least clarify whether statutory silence on controversial powers creates an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency?Decided 22-451