Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case Tracker

Cases compared

Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al. vs. West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson vs. Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar Association

Civil Rights cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

No. 24-38No. 24-43No. 25-1002

Side by side

Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al. vs. West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson vs. Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar Association, compared fact by fact
FactBradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather JacksonRajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar Association
DocketBradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.24-38West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson24-43Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar Association25-1002
StatusBradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.DecidedWest Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather JacksonDecidedRajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar AssociationBefore Arguments
DateBradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.Decided Jun 30, 2026West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather JacksonDecided Jun 30, 2026Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar AssociationOctober Term 2025 (2025–2026)
Question presentedBradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.Whether laws that seek to protect women's and girls' sports by limiting participation to women and girls based on sex violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson1. Whether Title IX prevents a state from consistently designating girls' and boys' sports teams based on biological sex determined at birth? 2. Whether the Equal Protection Clause prevents a state from offering separate boys' and girls' sports teams based on biological sex determined at birth?Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar AssociationWhether the First Amendment overrides antidiscrimination laws when the discrimination furthers the defendant’s views about “diversity,” “equity,” or “inclusion”?
SummaryBradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.The Court held that Idaho’s law limiting women’s and girls’ school sports teams to biological females does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit and sent the case back for further proceedings.West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather JacksonThe Court held that Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause allow West Virginia to limit girls’ and women’s school sports teams to students classified as biologically female at birth. The Court reversed the Fourth Circuit, ruling for West Virginia and remanding the case.Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar AssociationRajeh Saadeh challenges the New Jersey State Bar Association’s practice of reserving certain leadership positions for members of specified minority groups. He argues that the set-asides violate New Jersey’s antidiscrimination law, while the association contends that they are protected expressive activity under the First Amendment.

Relationship

Shared issue
Civil Rights
Why compared
Reviewed Civil Rights tags connect these current-term public cases.

Related

Sources

  • Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.