Skip to main content

No. 25-7311October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-7311October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Lynne A. Price, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Lynne Price asks the Supreme Court to review whether she may recover attorney’s fees from the IRS after it conceded her tax case.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Lynne Price asks the Supreme Court to review whether she may recover attorney’s fees from the IRS after it conceded her tax case. She paid her spouse-attorney’s professional corporation by check, but the lower court denied fees under a same-household theory that treated the representation as effectively unpaid family self-representation.

Question presented

1. Whether 26 U.S.C. § 7430 allows a prevailing taxpayer to recover “ reasonable fees paid or incurred ” for an attorney ’ s services when the taxpayer actually paid those fees by personal check to her spouse - attorney ’s professional corporation (John S. Winkler, P.A.) after the IRS conceded the case, or whether courts may categorically deny recovery under a “ same-household economic-realities ” test that is not in the statute ’ s text and which treats the payment as intra-family self-representation. 2. Whether the decision below conflicts with the plain language of § 7430, its legislative purpose to reimburse actual litigation costs and deter unjustified IRS positions, and analogous fee-shifting precedents that permit recovery when payment is made to a separate professional entity. 3. Whether the “ paid or incurred ” limitation in § 7430 is satisfied by a bona fide invoice and check payment to a spouse-attorney ’ s professional association (a distinct legal entity), or whether lower courts may disregard the plain text and legislative purpose of the statute by applying tax-substance doctrines (e.g., Frank Lyon Co.) to bar recovery in spousal-representation cases.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Business and Regulation

Briefing

What it's about

Lynne Price asks the Supreme Court to review whether she can recover attorney's fees from the IRS after it conceded her tax case. She paid her spouse-attorney's professional corporation by check, but the Eleventh Circuit treated the arrangement as unpaid family self-representation.

Argument

The petition is pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. Price argues that the fee statute's text permits recovery after a bona fide payment to a separate professional entity; the lower court used a same-household economic-realities approach.

Impact

The case could affect taxpayers who hire a spouse's separately incorporated law practice and later seek fee reimbursement from the IRS. For example, a taxpayer who pays a spouse-attorney's firm after defeating an IRS position could lose fees under a same-household test.

What is at stake in Price v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue?

The case asks whether Price may recover attorney's fees after paying her spouse-attorney's professional corporation by check.

Who could be affected by the Price case?

Taxpayers who use a spouse's separately incorporated law practice could be affected when seeking fees after an IRS case.

What happens next in Price v. Commissioner?

The Court may consider the petition for certiorari. Oral argument has not been scheduled.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3