No. 25-567October Term 2025Decided Jun 4, 2026Updated Sep 2, 2026
Verizon Communications v. Federal Communications Commission
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
The Court's decision addresses whether the FCC may impose monetary penalties for inadequate customer-data protections without guaranteeing a jury trial.
Case status
Decided 8-1 · June 4, 2026 · Opinion by Chief Justice Roberts
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 4, 2026
- Argued alongside
- What it's about
The Court held that the FCC may issue monetary forfeiture orders for violations of the Communications Act without first providing a jury trial. Because the orders do not finally settle the parties’ legal obligations and the FCC’s factual findings are not binding in a later collection suit, the Court ruled for the FCC, reversing one lower-court judgment and affirming the other.
Question presented
Whether the Communications Act violates the Seventh Amendment and Article III by authorizing the FCC to order the payment of monetary penalties for failing to reasonably safeguard customer data, without guaranteeing the defendant carrier a right to a jury trial.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit / Decision released Jun 4, 2026
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court's decision addresses whether the FCC may impose monetary penalties for inadequate customer-data protections without guaranteeing a jury trial.
Impact
The decision affects cellular carriers facing FCC penalties over treatment of customer location data. For example, the FCC assessed Verizon $47 million after finding it liable for violating confidentiality requirements. The case concerns whether carriers can obtain a jury trial (a trial decided by jurors) before paying. It could shape how carriers challenge FCC penalties after payment or after refusing to pay.
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 8-1
- Majority author
- John G. Roberts, Jr.
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court released a June 4, 2026 decision in a dispute over FCC monetary penalties against carriers that fail to reasonably safeguard customer data. The case asks whether this enforcement system denies carriers a jury trial or improperly gives judicial power to the FCC.
Vote
Impact
The decision affects wireless carriers facing FCC penalties over customer-data safeguards, including protections for location data. It also affects the FCC's ability to enforce those requirements through monetary penalties.
What's next
The FCC, wireless carriers, and lower courts will apply the Supreme Court's decision in enforcement cases involving customer-data safeguards. Carriers may need to adjust how they respond to FCC penalty proceedings.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Verizon v. FCC?
The Court issued a June 4, 2026 decision on whether FCC monetary penalties for inadequate customer-data safeguards require a jury trial.
Who is affected by Verizon v. FCC?
Wireless carriers subject to FCC customer-data rules are directly affected. Customers may also be affected by how the FCC enforces protections for location data.
What happens next after Verizon v. FCC?
The FCC and lower courts will apply the decision in future enforcement matters. Carriers will assess its effect on challenges to monetary penalties.
Timing
Decided June 4, 2026
The Court released its decision 44 days after oral argument on April 21, 2026. The median for cases argued in April is 57 days.
Documents
Activity
Docket activity6
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
Sep 2, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Sep 2, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 2, 2026 | Generated
Brief added: Questions Presented
Jun 5, 2026 | Court records
Opinion added: opinion
Jun 4, 2026 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Nov 6, 2025 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials9
Supreme Court docket 25-567
docket | Sep 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Sep 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Jun 5, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Jun 4, 2026
Petition
brief | Nov 6, 2025
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026