No. 25-180October Term 2025Decided Dec 8, 2025
John Doe, Petitioner v. Dynamic Physical Therapy, LLC, et al.
A state immunity statute cannot by itself block a plaintiff's federal claims.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Dec 8, 2025
- What it's about
The Court unanimously reversed and remanded in a 9-0 per curiam decision. The case involved a Louisiana state statute and was decided without oral argument.
Question presented
Whether a state statute can bar a plaintiff's federal claims by conferring immunity from liability.
- Case path
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit / Decision released Dec 8, 2025
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court said Louisiana could not use a state emergency-immunity law for healthcare providers to block John Doe's federal claims. The justices unanimously reversed the Louisiana appeals court and sent the case back.
Vote
The Court reversed 9-0 in an unsigned opinion and decided the case without oral argument.
“"That decision is incorrect. Defining the scope of liability under state law is the State's prerogative."”
Impact
The decision means a state cannot wipe out federal claims just by granting immunity under state law. For example, someone suing a healthcare provider under federal law during a public health emergency may still be able to pursue that federal claim.
What's next
The case returns to the Louisiana courts for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. The Supreme Court has finished this docket action.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy?
The Court said Louisiana could not use its state immunity law to block the plaintiff's federal claims. It reversed the state appeals court.
Who is affected by the Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy decision?
People bringing federal claims against healthcare providers during emergencies could benefit. States may set state-law liability rules, but they cannot erase federal claims that way.
What happens next in Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy?
The case goes back to the Louisiana courts for more proceedings under the Supreme Court's opinion. The Supreme Court's work on this docket is over.
Decision
What the Court decided
A state immunity statute cannot by itself block a plaintiff's federal claims.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
The decision means a state cannot wipe out federal claims just by granting immunity under state law. For example, someone suing a healthcare provider under federal law during a public health emergency may still be able to pursue that federal claim.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Timing
Decided December 8, 2025
The Court released its decision on December 8, 2025 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Aug 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 25-180
docket | Aug 30, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Aug 30, 2026
Opinion of the Court - Per Curiam
opinion | Dec 8, 2025
Opinion
opinion | Dec 8, 2025
Petition
brief | Jul 28, 2025
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Aug 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Aug 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Aug 2, 2026