No. 25-1412October Term 2025Before Arguments
James Tindall, Petitioner v. United States
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Case status
- Current stage
- Before Arguments
- Latest event
- Accepted by the Court
- Decision timing
- No window until argument is scheduled.
- What it's about
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Question presented
1. Whether Respondent’s multi-year possession, control and use of Petitioner’s property is a taking sufficient to trigger the payment of “just compensation”, as required by the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? 2. Whether the lower courts properly applied the doctrines of res judicata and claim preclusion when they ignored the two different and non-overlapping sets of transactional facts as clearly identified in Petitioner’s Amended 2025 Complaint (the first set of facts ending on September 12, 2023, and the second set of facts beginning on September 13, 2023) when determining if the lower court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1)? 3. Whether the lower courts properly applied the doctrines of res judicata and claim preclusion when both of the lower courts failed to correctly identify Petitioner’s property interests taken by Respondent, failed to identify when Petitioner’s property interests were taken and continue to be taken by Respondent and failed to identify when Respondent continues to breach the implied contract between the parties, which are necessary predicates to the legal conclusions reached by the lower courts? 4. Whether the lower courts properly applied Due Process, as required by the Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, when they failed to even identify the standard to be applied?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit / Accepted by the Court
- Area
Supreme Court case awaiting argument
Timing
Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term
The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.
Briefing
What it's about
James Tindall is asking the Supreme Court to hear a dispute over the federal government's alleged multi-year possession, control, and use of his property. His petition also says the lower courts wrongly applied claim preclusion (rules that can block repeat claims), res judicata (a rule against relitigating the same dispute), and due process when they reviewed his case.
Argument
The case is still at the petition stage, and no oral argument is scheduled. The petition says the government's multi-year possession and use of property should count as a taking and says the lower courts mishandled claim preclusion, jurisdiction, and due process.
Impact
If the Court takes the case, it could clarify when government use of private property becomes a taking that requires just compensation. It could also affect people who say their claims involve different time periods and should not be blocked by earlier litigation.
What is Tindall v. United States about?
The petition says the government had multi-year possession, control, and use of Tindall's property. It asks whether that should trigger just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.
Who could be affected if the Court takes this case?
Property owners suing the federal government could be affected, especially if they say government use continued over different time periods. The case also concerns when earlier litigation blocks new claims.
What happens next in James Tindall v. United States?
The Supreme Court must decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument is scheduled yet, and no decision window is available.
Related cases
Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 23, 2026
- Method
- Methodology