Skip to main content

No. 25-1409October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-1409October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Marmic, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Sergio Lopez

Marmic, LLC and Mike Ruane ask the Supreme Court to review a New Jersey ruling allowing Sergio Lopez to seek payment for work he performed.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Marmic, LLC and Mike Ruane ask the Supreme Court to review a New Jersey ruling allowing Sergio Lopez to seek payment for work he performed. The petition argues that Lopez, an unauthorized worker who allegedly used a false Social Security number to obtain the job, cannot recover under federal immigration law and the Court’s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds.

Question presented

Whether an unauthorized alien who intentionally uses a false Social Security number to obtain employment is eligible to recover for work performed under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (“IRCA”) of 1986, and this Court’s ruling in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002)?

Case path

Supreme Court of New Jersey / Petition pending

Area

Immigration

Briefing

What it's about

Marmic, LLC and Mike Ruane ask the Supreme Court to review a New Jersey decision allowing Sergio Lopez to seek payment for work he performed. They argue that federal immigration law and Hoffman Plastic Compounds bar recovery when an unauthorized worker intentionally used a false Social Security number to get the job.

Argument

The petition for certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) has been filed, but oral argument is not yet scheduled. Marmic and Ruane argue that IRCA and Hoffman Plastic Compounds prevent Lopez from recovering payment.

Impact

The case could affect whether unauthorized workers can seek unpaid compensation for work already done. For example, an employer and worker could face different rules on payment claims when the worker used false identification to obtain employment.

What is at stake in Marmic v. Lopez?

The dispute concerns whether an unauthorized worker who allegedly used a false Social Security number can seek payment for work performed.

Who could be affected by Marmic v. Lopez?

Employers and unauthorized workers could be affected when disputes arise over compensation for work already completed.

What happens next in Marmic v. Lopez?

The Court will decide whether to take up the petition and could make another scheduling move. Oral argument has not been scheduled.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3