No. 25-1409October Term 2025Petition Pending
Marmic, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Sergio Lopez
Marmic, LLC and Mike Ruane ask the Supreme Court to review a New Jersey ruling allowing Sergio Lopez to seek payment for work he performed.
Case status
- Current stage
- Petition Pending
- Latest event
- Petition pending
- Decision timing
- No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
- What it's about
Marmic, LLC and Mike Ruane ask the Supreme Court to review a New Jersey ruling allowing Sergio Lopez to seek payment for work he performed. The petition argues that Lopez, an unauthorized worker who allegedly used a false Social Security number to obtain the job, cannot recover under federal immigration law and the Court’s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds.
Question presented
Whether an unauthorized alien who intentionally uses a false Social Security number to obtain employment is eligible to recover for work performed under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (“IRCA”) of 1986, and this Court’s ruling in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002)?
- Case path
Supreme Court of New Jersey / Petition pending
- Area
Immigration
Briefing
What it's about
Marmic, LLC and Mike Ruane ask the Supreme Court to review a New Jersey decision allowing Sergio Lopez to seek payment for work he performed. They argue that federal immigration law and Hoffman Plastic Compounds bar recovery when an unauthorized worker intentionally used a false Social Security number to get the job.
Argument
The petition for certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) has been filed, but oral argument is not yet scheduled. Marmic and Ruane argue that IRCA and Hoffman Plastic Compounds prevent Lopez from recovering payment.
Impact
The case could affect whether unauthorized workers can seek unpaid compensation for work already done. For example, an employer and worker could face different rules on payment claims when the worker used false identification to obtain employment.
What is at stake in Marmic v. Lopez?
The dispute concerns whether an unauthorized worker who allegedly used a false Social Security number can seek payment for work performed.
Who could be affected by Marmic v. Lopez?
Employers and unauthorized workers could be affected when disputes arise over compensation for work already completed.
What happens next in Marmic v. Lopez?
The Court will decide whether to take up the petition and could make another scheduling move. Oral argument has not been scheduled.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Method
- Methodology