No. 25-1366October Term 2025Petition PendingUpdated Sep 2, 2026
D. Andrew Wilson v. Miller

Case status
Where it stands
Awaiting an order on the petition
- Next
- No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
What it's about
Ohio asks the Supreme Court to uphold parts of its three-tier alcohol system that bar out-of-state retailers from shipping wine directly to Ohio consumers and limit how much alcohol residents may personally bring into the state. The case concerns whether those rules are permitted by the Twenty-first Amendment despite constitutional limits on state laws that burden interstate commerce.
Question presented
Under §2 of the Twenty-first Amendment, may a State restrict out-of-state retailers from directly shipping alcohol to in-state consumers and may it cap the amount of alcohol that individuals may personally transport into the State?
What happens next
Watch for the Court to decide whether to hear the case or for another scheduling move. No decision window is available yet.
Why it matters
The case could affect Ohio consumers seeking to order wine from retailers outside the state. It could also affect out-of-state retailers that want to sell directly to customers in Ohio.
The dispute concerns how far states may use the Twenty-first Amendment to control alcohol entering their borders.
Case file
- Docket
- 25-1366
- Status
- Petition Pending
- From
- United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Issue
- Documents
- 1
Documents
Docket activity
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Brief added: Petition
More questions
- What is at stake in Wilson v. Miller?
- The case asks whether Ohio may restrict direct alcohol shipments from out-of-state retailers and limit alcohol people personally transport into Ohio.
- Who could be affected by Ohio's alcohol rules?
- Ohio consumers seeking wine from out-of-state retailers could be affected. Retailers outside Ohio that want to ship directly to those consumers could also be affected.
- What happens next in Wilson v. Miller?
- The Court will decide whether to grant certiorari, meaning agree to hear the case. Oral argument has not been scheduled.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.



