Skip to main content
Docket 24-539October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Kaley Chiles, Petitioner v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.

The Court has now answered the constitutional challenge to Colorado's conversion-therapy ban, and that answer will control similar disputes going forward.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Mar 31, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardOct 7, 2025
Decision ReleasedMar 31, 2026
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Question presented

Does a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy”—i.e., attempts to “convert” someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity—violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit / Decision released Mar 31, 2026

Area

First Amendment

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court decided a case over whether Colorado may ban licensed counselors from providing so-called conversion therapy aimed at changing a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. The dispute asked whether that law violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause.

Impact

The decision affects licensed mental health counselors in Colorado and could shape similar laws elsewhere. It also matters to minors, parents, and state regulators who must follow the Court's ruling in day-to-day counseling practice.

What's next

Lower courts, Colorado regulators, and licensed counselors must now follow the Supreme Court's opinion in applying or challenging the law. Agencies and affected parties will review the decision to determine what counseling practices are allowed and how existing rules or cases should proceed.

What was the core dispute in this case?

The case asked whether Colorado's ban on conversion therapy violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The challenger is Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor.

Who could feel the decision's effects right away?

Licensed counselors, Colorado regulators, minors, and families could be affected first. The ruling may also influence how other states write or defend similar counseling rules.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?

Lower courts and agencies must apply the Supreme Court's opinion. Counselors and state officials will likely review current practices, enforcement steps, and any pending related cases.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court has now answered the constitutional challenge to Colorado's conversion-therapy ban, and that answer will control similar disputes going forward.

Impact

Licensed counselors, their minor clients, and families in Colorado are directly affected. The Court said Colorado cannot apply this ban to a counselor who uses only talk therapy. For example, a minor seeking counseling to reduce unwanted sexual attractions could discuss that goal with Chiles. Next, challenges to similar state laws may focus on viewpoint discrimination (government favoring one side of a debate). The Court left for another

Not official Court text.

Vote

Other opinions

Concurring

Dissenting

Opinion documents