Kaley Chiles, Petitioner v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.
The Court has now answered the constitutional challenge to Colorado's conversion-therapy ban, and that answer will control similar disputes going forward.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Mar 31, 2026
- What it's about
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Question presented
Does a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy”—i.e., attempts to “convert” someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity—violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit / Decision released Mar 31, 2026
- Area
First Amendment
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court decided a case over whether Colorado may ban licensed counselors from providing so-called conversion therapy aimed at changing a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. The dispute asked whether that law violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause.
Impact
The decision affects licensed mental health counselors in Colorado and could shape similar laws elsewhere. It also matters to minors, parents, and state regulators who must follow the Court's ruling in day-to-day counseling practice.
What's next
Lower courts, Colorado regulators, and licensed counselors must now follow the Supreme Court's opinion in applying or challenging the law. Agencies and affected parties will review the decision to determine what counseling practices are allowed and how existing rules or cases should proceed.
What was the core dispute in this case?
The case asked whether Colorado's ban on conversion therapy violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The challenger is Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor.
Who could feel the decision's effects right away?
Licensed counselors, Colorado regulators, minors, and families could be affected first. The ruling may also influence how other states write or defend similar counseling rules.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?
Lower courts and agencies must apply the Supreme Court's opinion. Counselors and state officials will likely review current practices, enforcement steps, and any pending related cases.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court has now answered the constitutional challenge to Colorado's conversion-therapy ban, and that answer will control similar disputes going forward.
Impact
Licensed counselors, their minor clients, and families in Colorado are directly affected. The Court said Colorado cannot apply this ban to a counselor who uses only talk therapy. For example, a minor seeking counseling to reduce unwanted sexual attractions could discuss that goal with Chiles. Next, challenges to similar state laws may focus on viewpoint discrimination (government favoring one side of a debate). The Court left for another
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 8-1
- Majority author
- Neil Gorsuch
Other opinions
Concurring
- Elena Kagan(author)
Dissenting
- Ketanji Brown Jackson(author)
Opinion documents
Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jun 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 24-539
docket | Jun 8, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jun 8, 2026
Opinion of the Court - NG
opinion | Mar 31, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
Oral Arguments - Chiles
audio | Oct 7, 2025
Petition
brief | Nov 8, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026



