Skip to main content

No. 25-1254October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-1254October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Judith L. Harvey, as Trustee of the David T. & Judith L. Harvey Trust, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of David T. Harvey, Deceased, Petitioner v. City of Reno, Nevada, et al.

This case concerns whether Nevada government entities must pay compensation after a state agency allegedly sold the only practical access route to the Harvey Trust’s property, leaving it landlocked and without value.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

This case concerns whether Nevada government entities must pay compensation after a state agency allegedly sold the only practical access route to the Harvey Trust’s property, leaving it landlocked and without value. The petition asks the Supreme Court to review the Nevada Supreme Court’s handling of the trust’s Fifth Amendment takings claim.

Question presented

Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause requires just compensation when a state agency sells the only feasible access to private property, rendering it landlocked and valueless?

Case path

Supreme Court of Nevada / Petition pending

Area

Administrative Law

Briefing

What it's about

The Harvey Trust asks the Supreme Court to hear its claim that Nevada government entities sold the only practical route to its property. The trust says that left the land landlocked and without value, requiring payment under the Fifth Amendment.

Argument

The petition for certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) has been filed, and oral argument has not been scheduled.

Impact

The case could affect property owners whose usable access is lost through government action. For example, an owner of rural land could argue for compensation if losing the only feasible road makes the land unusable.

What is at stake in Harvey v. City of Reno?

The case asks whether the Fifth Amendment requires payment when a state agency sells the only feasible access to private land, leaving it valueless.

Who could be affected if the Harvey Trust wins review?

Property owners who lose their only practical access route through government action could be affected. State and local agencies managing roads or land could be affected too.

What happens next in Harvey v. City of Reno?

The Supreme Court will decide whether to grant certiorari (agree to hear the case) or take another scheduling action. Oral argument is not yet scheduled.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3