No. 25-1254October Term 2025Petition Pending
Judith L. Harvey, as Trustee of the David T. & Judith L. Harvey Trust, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of David T. Harvey, Deceased, Petitioner v. City of Reno, Nevada, et al.
This case concerns whether Nevada government entities must pay compensation after a state agency allegedly sold the only practical access route to the Harvey Trust’s property, leaving it landlocked and without value.
Case status
- Current stage
- Petition Pending
- Latest event
- Petition pending
- Decision timing
- No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
- What it's about
This case concerns whether Nevada government entities must pay compensation after a state agency allegedly sold the only practical access route to the Harvey Trust’s property, leaving it landlocked and without value. The petition asks the Supreme Court to review the Nevada Supreme Court’s handling of the trust’s Fifth Amendment takings claim.
Question presented
Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause requires just compensation when a state agency sells the only feasible access to private property, rendering it landlocked and valueless?
- Case path
Supreme Court of Nevada / Petition pending
- Area
Administrative Law
Briefing
What it's about
The Harvey Trust asks the Supreme Court to hear its claim that Nevada government entities sold the only practical route to its property. The trust says that left the land landlocked and without value, requiring payment under the Fifth Amendment.
Argument
The petition for certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) has been filed, and oral argument has not been scheduled.
Impact
The case could affect property owners whose usable access is lost through government action. For example, an owner of rural land could argue for compensation if losing the only feasible road makes the land unusable.
What is at stake in Harvey v. City of Reno?
The case asks whether the Fifth Amendment requires payment when a state agency sells the only feasible access to private land, leaving it valueless.
Who could be affected if the Harvey Trust wins review?
Property owners who lose their only practical access route through government action could be affected. State and local agencies managing roads or land could be affected too.
What happens next in Harvey v. City of Reno?
The Supreme Court will decide whether to grant certiorari (agree to hear the case) or take another scheduling action. Oral argument is not yet scheduled.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Method
- Methodology