Skip to main content

No. 25-1243October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-1243October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Nexstar Media Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. DirecTV, LLC

Nexstar Media Group asks the Supreme Court to review a Second Circuit ruling that allowed DirecTV to seek antitrust damages for claimed lost downstream revenue after it chose not to buy allegedly price-fixed television programming.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Nexstar Media Group asks the Supreme Court to review a Second Circuit ruling that allowed DirecTV to seek antitrust damages for claimed lost downstream revenue after it chose not to buy allegedly price-fixed television programming. The case concerns whether a business that did not purchase the allegedly overpriced product can nevertheless show the direct, non-speculative injury required for antitrust standing.

Question presented

Whether a plaintiff has antitrust standing to recover purported downstream losses flowing from its decision not to purchase an allegedly price-fixed product?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Business and Regulation

Briefing

What it's about

Nexstar asks the Supreme Court to review a Second Circuit decision allowing DirecTV to seek antitrust damages for lost downstream revenue after declining to buy allegedly price-fixed television programming. The question is whether that choice can create antitrust standing (the right to sue for antitrust damages).

Argument

The petition for certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) has been filed, and oral argument has not been scheduled. Nexstar argues that a business declining to buy an allegedly overpriced product generally cannot claim antitrust damages based on hypothetical downstream losses.

Impact

The case could affect when businesses may seek damages after refusing to buy a product they say was overpriced by price fixing. For example, a television distributor could face different limits on claims for lost subscriber or advertising revenue.

What is at stake in Nexstar v. DirecTV?

The case asks whether DirecTV may seek antitrust damages for downstream revenue it says it lost after not buying allegedly price-fixed programming.

Who could be affected by the Nexstar v. DirecTV dispute?

Television distributors and programming sellers could face different rules for damages claims tied to purchases a business chose not to make.

What happens next in Nexstar v. DirecTV?

The Court may decide whether to grant certiorari, meaning it will hear the case, or issue another scheduling action. Oral argument is not scheduled.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3