Skip to main content

No. 24-809October Term 2024Decided Jun 30, 2025

Docket 24-809October Term 2024 (2024–2025)

Howard Goldey, Associate Warden, et al., Petitioners v. Andrew Fields, III, et al.

The Supreme Court reversed a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Goldey v.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 30, 2025
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 30, 2025
What it's about

The Supreme Court reversed a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Goldey v. Fields and sent the case back to lower courts for further review. The Court found this case was meaningfully different from previous cases where it had recognized certain legal principles.

Question presented

1. Whether the "no-probable-cause" requirement for First Amendment retaliation claims, as set forth in *Nieves v. Bartlett*, 587 U.S. 391 (2019), applies when a plaintiff alleges that the statute under which he was arrested is unconstitutional. 2. Whether, for purposes of qualified immunity, it was "clearly established" that an arrest supported by probable cause violates the First Amendment if the underlying statute is later challenged as unconstitutional.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Jun 30, 2025

Area

First Amendment

Grounding

Grounding
Primary-source trail available.
Note
Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Mar 31, 2026
Primary materials4