White v. EDS Care Mgmt.
In brief
The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear White’s case, leaving the Michigan judgment in place without deciding her claims.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 18, 2020
- What it’s about
- White sought Supreme Court review of Michigan-court proceedings, alleging that race, questions about her capacity, and alleged misconduct by medical providers, lawyers, and court officials were improperly handled.
- Who it affects
- The Michigan court’s judgment remains in place for White, but the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule on her claims.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Supreme Court denied review, leaving the Michigan court’s judgment in place.
White filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review Michigan-court proceedings and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. Her filing alleged that race, questions about her capacity, and misconduct by medical providers, lawyers, and court officials were mishandled.
This was a request for U.S. Supreme Court review of a judgment from the Supreme Court of Michigan.
Question presented
1. Must a court overlook a plaintiff's race in making a decision about her capacity and her right to defend herself against attempted murder by doctors, hospitals, and attorneys who made poor legal decisions, motivated by race, political and economic gain (RICO)? 2. Must a court overlook evidence of past disciplinary action against doctors, attorneys, and court officials who made poor legal decisions? 3. Must a court be the only authority responsible for reshaping of statues to fit the new world we live in to deter fraud and human abuse? 4. Must a court continue to have the authority to protect all vulnerable citizens from exploitations? 5. Must a court bare the burden of interpreting what is dishonesty or misrepresentation of facts that constitute penalty or not?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court’s docket action is finished. The order leaves the Michigan judgment in place and supplies no ruling on the disputed legal questions.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.