Skip to main content

New v. United States

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court declined to hear the case (denied the petition), so it did not decide whether the Navajo Treaty requires the United States to pay damages.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · June 1, 2020

What it’s about
The Court declined to review the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that the 1868 Navajo Treaty’s “bad men” provision does not require the United States to pay damages to a Navajo victim of a crime committed by a non-Indian on the reservation.
Who it affects
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling remained in place for this case, but the Supreme Court gave no answer on whether the treaty requires the United States to pay damages.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for New v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The United States therefore prevailed, and the lower court’s decision remained in place.

The dispute centered on whether the treaty’s “bad men” provision, which mentions arrest, punishment, and reimbursement, creates a damages claim against the United States.

Question presented

Whether the "bad men" provision of the 1868 Treaty with the Navajo, which provides that the United States will "cause the offender to be arrested and punished according to the laws of the United States, and also reimburse the injured person for the loss sustained," requires the United States to pay money damages to a Navajo victim of a crime committed by a non-Indian on the Navajo Reservation.

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

This Supreme Court docket action is finished. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling remains in place in this case; the Supreme Court did not resolve the treaty question.

Documents

2

Docket activity

21
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

1
What did the Ninth Circuit decide?
It ruled that the treaty provision does not require the United States to pay damages to a Navajo victim of a crime committed by a non-Indian on the reservation.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis