Skip to main content

Allen v. Cooper

Updated Sep 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court upheld the Fourth Circuit's ruling and decided that the CRCA could not remove states' legal protection from copyright-infringement suits.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · March 23, 2020 · Opinion by Justice Kagan

What it’s about
Frederick Allen and Nautilus Productions claimed that North Carolina infringed their copyrights in photographs and videos of a historic shipwreck.
Who it affects
The ruling means the CRCA cannot remove states' legal protection from private copyright-infringement suits. It also leaves the Fourth Circuit's ruling in place in the dispute over North Carolina's use of those photos and videos.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Allen v. Cooper
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court (affirmed its ruling) that Congress’s Copyright Remedy Clarification Act did not remove states’ immunity from copyright-infringement suits.

The case tested whether Congress could use its copyright power to let private owners sue states despite states' legal protection from private lawsuits.

Question presented

Whether Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity via the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act, Pub. L. No. 101-553, 104 Stat. 2749 (1990), in providing remedies for authors of original expression whose federal copyrights are infringed by States.

What the Court decided

Holding

Congress lacked authority to abrogate the States’ immunity from copyright infringement suits in the CRCA. 895 F. 3d 337, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Kaganwrote the opinion
  2. Thomasalso wrote separately
  3. Kavanaugh
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Roberts
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Alito
Concurring · 2agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Breyerwrote separately
  2. Ginsburg
9 justices joined the judgment (2 writing separately).

What's next

The Supreme Court's review is complete, and the Fourth Circuit's ruling remains in place.

Documents

3

Docket activity

11
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 6 more
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Jul 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Mar 23, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 4, 2019 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What did Allen v. Cooper decide?
It upheld the Fourth Circuit's ruling and decided that Congress lacked authority to remove states' legal protection from copyright-infringement suits through the CRCA.
Why did the copyright holder sue North Carolina?
North Carolina used copyrighted photos and videos from the Blackbeard shipwreck recovery without permission.
What does the ruling mean for copyright owners suing states?
They cannot rely on the CRCA to remove states' legal protection from private copyright-infringement suits.
What happens next in Allen v. Cooper?
Supreme Court review is complete, and the Fourth Circuit's ruling remains in place.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis