No. 18-364October Term 2018Decided Mar 4, 2019
Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders, et al., Petitioners v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, et al.
The Supreme Court did not answer the constitutional question here; it simply chose not to hear the case.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Mar 4, 2019
- What it's about
from the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Question presented
Whether and when the Free Exercise Clause prohibits exclusion from generally available government programs based on a participant’s religious status?
- Case path
Supreme Court of New Jersey / Decision released Mar 4, 2019
- Area
First Amendment
Briefing
What it's about
This case asked whether the Free Exercise Clause blocks governments from excluding houses of worship from generally available public programs because they are religious. On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court declined review, so it did not decide that question on the merits and left the New Jersey result in place.
Vote
The Court declined review on March 4, 2019; the prompt does not provide a vote count or opinion lineup.
Impact
The dispute affects whether churches and other religious groups can compete for public benefits such as historic-preservation grants. For example, a house of worship seeking repair money for a historic building could be treated differently depending on the state and the courts involved.
What's next
There is no further Supreme Court action in this docket. The lower-court ruling remains in effect unless a future case presents the issue again and the Court agrees to hear it.
What was the core dispute in this case?
The petition asked whether governments may exclude houses of worship from generally available public programs because they are religious. It focused on historic-preservation funding after Trinity Lutheran.
What are the real-world consequences of the Court's action?
Because the Court declined review, religious institutions and local governments still face different rules in different places. That matters for grants tied to preserving historic church buildings.
What was the next procedural step after March 4, 2019?
There was no merits stage in the Supreme Court after that order. The case ended there, and the New Jersey judgment stayed in place.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Supreme Court did not answer the constitutional question here; it simply chose not to hear the case.
Impact
The dispute affects whether churches and other religious groups can compete for public benefits such as historic-preservation grants. For example, a house of worship seeking repair money for a historic building could be treated differently depending on the state and the courts involved.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jun 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology