Skip to main content

No. 18-1584October Term 2019Decided Jun 15, 2020

Docket 18-1584October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Assn.

The Appalachian Trail's route through a national forest did not, by itself, block the Forest Service from issuing this pipeline crossing permit.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 15, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 15, 2020
What it's about

This case was about whether the U.S. Forest Service could allow the Atlantic Coast Pipeline to pass beneath the Appalachian Trail where the trail crosses national forest land in Virginia. The dispute turned on whether land crossed by the Appalachian Trail becomes part of the National Park System, which would block the pipeline right-of-way under the Mineral Leasing Act.

Question presented

Whether the Forest Service has authority to grant rights-of-way under the Mineral Leasing Act through lands traversed by the Appalachian Trail within national forests.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Jun 15, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court said the Forest Service could grant a pipeline right-of-way beneath the Appalachian Trail where the trail crosses national forest land in Virginia. The justices concluded that the trail's presence did not by itself turn that land into National Park System land for this purpose.

Impact

The decision mattered for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and for other projects that need permission to cross federal land. It also clarified that a trail crossing does not automatically shift control away from the Forest Service.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any remaining issues would be handled in lower courts or by federal agencies under the Court's reading of the Mineral Leasing Act.

Why did the Appalachian Trail matter in this pipeline case?

Opponents said land under the trail became National Park System land, which would bar a right-of-way under the Mineral Leasing Act. The Court disagreed.

Who is affected by the Court's answer?

Federal land managers, pipeline companies, and environmental groups are directly affected. For example, projects crossing national forest land under the trail may still seek federal permission.

What happened after the Supreme Court's decision?

The Court finished this docket action. Any remaining disputes returned to lower courts or agencies, using the Supreme Court's reading of the law.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Appalachian Trail's route through a national forest did not, by itself, block the Forest Service from issuing this pipeline crossing permit.

Impact

The decision mattered for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and for other projects that need permission to cross federal land. It also clarified that a trail crossing does not automatically shift control away from the Forest Service.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents