Skip to main content

Liu v. SEC

Updated Sep 18, 2026

In brief

The Court allowed disgorgement for victims up to a wrongdoer’s net profits, but wiped out the Ninth Circuit’s ruling (vacated it) and sent the case back to the lower courts (remanded it).

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 8-1 · June 22, 2020 · Opinion by Justice Sotomayor

What it’s about
This case asked whether the SEC can make people who violated securities laws give up their ill-gotten gains through disgorgement in a civil enforcement action.
Who it affects
The decision limits disgorgement in SEC cases to a wrongdoer’s net profits when the award is for victims. The lower courts must apply those limits to the particular award here.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Liu v. SEC
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court held that disgorgement is allowed as equitable relief under federal law, but only when it is limited to a wrongdoer’s net profits and is generally returned to victims.

More broadly, the case set boundaries for how the SEC can use disgorgement in civil enforcement of securities laws.

Question presented

Whether the Securities and Exchange Commission may seek and obtain disgorgement from a court as "equitable relief" for a securities law violation even though this Court has determined that such disgorgement is a penalty.

What the Court decided

Holding

A disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible under §78u(d)(5). 505, vacated and remanded.

Result
Vacated

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 8joined the Court's opinion
  1. Sotomayorwrote the opinion
  2. Roberts
  3. Breyer
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Alito
  6. Kagan
  7. Gorsuch
  8. Kavanaugh
Dissenting · 1disagreed with the result
  1. Thomaswrote the dissent
8 justices joined the judgment, 1 dissented.

From the opinions

“Disgorgement can never be awarded under 15 U. S. C. §78u(d)(5).”

— Justice Thomas(dissent)

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its review. It sent the case back to the lower courts (remanded it), which must apply the net-profit and victim-benefit limits to the disgorgement award.

Documents

4

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jun 22, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    May 31, 2019 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Mar 22, 2019 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

5
What did Liu v. SEC decide about SEC disgorgement?
The Court allowed disgorgement as equitable relief when the award stays within a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims.
Why did the Court send Liu v. SEC back?
The Court wiped out the Ninth Circuit’s ruling (vacated it) and sent the case back to lower courts (remanded it) to apply those limits.
What remains unresolved in Liu v. SEC?
The lower courts must still apply the net-profit and victim-benefit limits to the specific disgorgement award.
Who wrote the Supreme Court’s opinion in Liu v. SEC?
Justice Sotomayor wrote it, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh signing on.
Did Justice Thomas agree with the Court?
No. Justice Thomas said disgorgement can never be awarded under 15 U. S. C. §78u(d)(5) and would have overturned the Ninth Circuit’s judgment.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis