Skip to main content

No. 18-1455October Term 2019Decided Apr 6, 2020

Docket 18-1455October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Archdiocese of Washington, Petitioner v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al.

The Supreme Court did not answer the religious-advertising question and simply let the lower-court decision stand.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 6, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedApr 6, 2020
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Question presented

Whether a public transit system may allow many secular ads, including holiday and charitable messages, while excluding a similar ad because it is religious?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Apr 6, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The Archdiocese of Washington challenged WMATA's refusal to run a bus ad for its Christmas campaign because the transit system treated it as religious advertising. On April 6, 2020, the Supreme Court declined review and left the lower-court result in place without deciding the merits.

Vote

The Court declined review on April 6, 2020, but no vote count or opinion details are provided here.

Impact

The case affects whether public transit systems can accept many secular holiday or charity ads while rejecting similar religious messages. That matters for groups like churches, charities, and agencies that use bus ads to reach the public.

What's next

This docket action is over at the Supreme Court. The lower-court ruling remains in effect, and the Court's refusal to hear the case did not settle the underlying constitutional question nationwide.

What was the core dispute in Archdiocese of Washington v. WMATA?

The Archdiocese said WMATA allowed many secular holiday and charity ads but rejected its similar Christmas ad because it was religious.

Who could feel the real-world effects of the Court's action here?

Religious groups, nonprofits, and transit agencies could all be affected. Transit systems may keep applying their current ad policies unless other courts say otherwise.

What was the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's April 6, 2020 action?

There was no further Supreme Court step in this docket. The Court finished the case by declining review, leaving the lower-court result in place.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court did not answer the religious-advertising question and simply let the lower-court decision stand.

Impact

The case affects whether public transit systems can accept many secular holiday or charity ads while rejecting similar religious messages. That matters for groups like churches, charities, and agencies that use bus ads to reach the public.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents