No. 18-1455October Term 2019Decided Apr 6, 2020
Archdiocese of Washington, Petitioner v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al.
The Supreme Court did not answer the religious-advertising question and simply let the lower-court decision stand.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Apr 6, 2020
- What it's about
from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Question presented
Whether a public transit system may allow many secular ads, including holiday and charitable messages, while excluding a similar ad because it is religious?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Apr 6, 2020
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
The Archdiocese of Washington challenged WMATA's refusal to run a bus ad for its Christmas campaign because the transit system treated it as religious advertising. On April 6, 2020, the Supreme Court declined review and left the lower-court result in place without deciding the merits.
Vote
The Court declined review on April 6, 2020, but no vote count or opinion details are provided here.
Impact
The case affects whether public transit systems can accept many secular holiday or charity ads while rejecting similar religious messages. That matters for groups like churches, charities, and agencies that use bus ads to reach the public.
What's next
This docket action is over at the Supreme Court. The lower-court ruling remains in effect, and the Court's refusal to hear the case did not settle the underlying constitutional question nationwide.
What was the core dispute in Archdiocese of Washington v. WMATA?
The Archdiocese said WMATA allowed many secular holiday and charity ads but rejected its similar Christmas ad because it was religious.
Who could feel the real-world effects of the Court's action here?
Religious groups, nonprofits, and transit agencies could all be affected. Transit systems may keep applying their current ad policies unless other courts say otherwise.
What was the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's April 6, 2020 action?
There was no further Supreme Court step in this docket. The Court finished the case by declining review, leaving the lower-court result in place.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Supreme Court did not answer the religious-advertising question and simply let the lower-court decision stand.
Impact
The case affects whether public transit systems can accept many secular holiday or charity ads while rejecting similar religious messages. That matters for groups like churches, charities, and agencies that use bus ads to reach the public.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jun 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 18-1455
docket | Jun 1, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jun 1, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jun 1, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Apr 6, 2020
Petition
brief | May 20, 2019
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Feb 27, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026