Skip to main content

No. 18-1447October Term 2020Decided Feb 3, 2021

Docket 18-1447October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

Republic of Hungary v. Simon

The Court did not settle the survivors' claims; it told the lower court to reconsider the case under the approach used in Philipp.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Feb 3, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedFeb 3, 2021
What it's about

This case involves Holocaust survivors and their heirs suing Hungary and its national railway in U.S. courts for property allegedly seized during World War II. The Supreme Court vacated the lower court’s ruling and sent the case back for reconsideration in light of Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp, which addressed when the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act allows such suits against foreign governments.

Question presented

May the district court abstain from exercising jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act for reasons of international comity, where former Hungarian nationals have sued the nation of Hungary to recover the value of property lost in Hungary during World War II, and where the plaintiffs made no attempt to exhaust local Hungarian remedies?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Feb 3, 2021

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

Holocaust survivors and their heirs sued Hungary and its national railway in U.S. courts over property allegedly taken during World War II. The Supreme Court set aside the D.C. Circuit's ruling and sent the case back for reconsideration in light of Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp.

Vote

In a per curiam decision issued on February 3, 2021, the Court vacated the D.C. Circuit's ruling and sent the case back in light of Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp. The prompt does not provide a vote count or separate lineup details.

for further proceedings consistent with Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp

— Justice Per Curiam(majority)

Impact

The decision affects whether people can use U.S. courts to sue foreign governments over wartime property losses. For example, the survivors and heirs in this case must now go through more review before their claims can move forward.

What's next

The case goes back to the lower courts for further proceedings consistent with Philipp. Those courts must reconsider whether the suit can continue in U.S. court.

What was the main dispute in Republic of Hungary v. Simon?

The fight was over whether Holocaust survivors and heirs could sue Hungary and its railway in U.S. court for World War II property losses. The Supreme Court told the lower court to reconsider that question under Philipp.

Who is most affected by the Supreme Court's action here?

The immediate impact falls on the survivors and heirs who brought this case. More broadly, it matters to people trying to sue foreign governments in U.S. courts over property taken abroad.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?

The case returns to the lower courts. They must take another look at the claims using the guidance from Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court did not settle the survivors' claims; it told the lower court to reconsider the case under the approach used in Philipp.

Result
Vacated

Impact

The decision affects whether people can use U.S. courts to sue foreign governments over wartime property losses. For example, the survivors and heirs in this case must now go through more review before their claims can move forward.

Not official Court text.