Skip to main content

No. 18-1334October Term 2019Decided Jun 1, 2020

Docket 18-1334October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC

The case focused on whether Puerto Rico's oversight board was appointed in a constitutional way and whether its past work could still stand.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 1, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 1, 2020
What it's about

This case was about the federal oversight board Congress created under PROMESA to manage Puerto Rico’s debt crisis. Creditors argued that the board’s members were appointed unconstitutionally because the President chose them without Senate confirmation, and they also challenged whether the board’s past actions could still stand.

Question presented

Whether the Appointments Clause governs the appointment of members of the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit / Decision released Jun 1, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

On June 1, 2020, the Supreme Court resolved this dispute over whether the Constitution's Appointments Clause governs members of Puerto Rico's federal oversight board. Creditors said the President chose those members without Senate confirmation and also challenged whether the board's earlier actions could remain in place.

Impact

The answer affects Puerto Rico's debt restructuring and the authority of the oversight board created under PROMESA. That matters to creditors, Puerto Rico's government, and residents who could feel the effects in budgets and public services.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any remaining steps would occur in lower courts or Puerto Rico's debt proceedings under the Court's decision.

What was the core dispute in this case?

The main fight was whether the Appointments Clause covers members of Puerto Rico's federal oversight board. Creditors said Senate confirmation was required.

Why did this matter in the real world for Puerto Rico?

The board was managing Puerto Rico's debt crisis under PROMESA. If its members were appointed wrongly, creditors argued its earlier actions could be questioned.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's action here?

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further proceedings would occur in lower courts or related debt cases.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The case focused on whether Puerto Rico's oversight board was appointed in a constitutional way and whether its past work could still stand.

Impact

The answer affects Puerto Rico's debt restructuring and the authority of the oversight board created under PROMESA. That matters to creditors, Puerto Rico's government, and residents who could feel the effects in budgets and public services.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents