No. 18-1334October Term 2019Decided Jun 1, 2020
Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC
The case focused on whether Puerto Rico's oversight board was appointed in a constitutional way and whether its past work could still stand.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 1, 2020
- What it's about
This case was about the federal oversight board Congress created under PROMESA to manage Puerto Rico’s debt crisis. Creditors argued that the board’s members were appointed unconstitutionally because the President chose them without Senate confirmation, and they also challenged whether the board’s past actions could still stand.
Question presented
Whether the Appointments Clause governs the appointment of members of the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit / Decision released Jun 1, 2020
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
On June 1, 2020, the Supreme Court resolved this dispute over whether the Constitution's Appointments Clause governs members of Puerto Rico's federal oversight board. Creditors said the President chose those members without Senate confirmation and also challenged whether the board's earlier actions could remain in place.
Impact
The answer affects Puerto Rico's debt restructuring and the authority of the oversight board created under PROMESA. That matters to creditors, Puerto Rico's government, and residents who could feel the effects in budgets and public services.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any remaining steps would occur in lower courts or Puerto Rico's debt proceedings under the Court's decision.
What was the core dispute in this case?
The main fight was whether the Appointments Clause covers members of Puerto Rico's federal oversight board. Creditors said Senate confirmation was required.
Why did this matter in the real world for Puerto Rico?
The board was managing Puerto Rico's debt crisis under PROMESA. If its members were appointed wrongly, creditors argued its earlier actions could be questioned.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's action here?
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further proceedings would occur in lower courts or related debt cases.
Decision
What the Court decided
The case focused on whether Puerto Rico's oversight board was appointed in a constitutional way and whether its past work could still stand.
Impact
The answer affects Puerto Rico's debt restructuring and the authority of the oversight board created under PROMESA. That matters to creditors, Puerto Rico's government, and residents who could feel the effects in budgets and public services.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 18-1334
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jun 1, 2020
Petition
brief | Apr 23, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026