No. 18-1259October Term 2020Decided Apr 22, 2021
Jones v. Mississippi
A judge may sentence a juvenile to life without parole without first making a separate finding that the child is permanently incorrigible, if the sentence is discretionary.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Apr 22, 2021
- What it's about
This case involved Brett Jones, who was 15 when he killed his grandfather and was later resentenced to life without parole after the Court’s juvenile sentencing decisions in Miller and Montgomery. The Supreme Court considered whether the Constitution requires a judge to make a separate finding that a juvenile offender is permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole.
Question presented
Whether the Eighth Amendment requires the sentencing authority to make a finding that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a sentence of life without parole.
- Case path
Court of Appeals of Mississippi / Decision released Apr 22, 2021
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
The case asked whether the Eighth Amendment requires a judge to make a separate finding that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole. The Court said no, so long as the sentence is not mandatory and the sentencer has discretion to impose a lesser punishment.
Impact
This affects juveniles convicted of murder who face life without parole and the judges who sentence them. In discretionary sentencing systems, courts may impose that punishment without a separate finding of permanent incorrigibility.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this case. Lower courts and sentencing judges will apply this rule in future juvenile life-without-parole cases.
What was the main dispute in Jones v. Mississippi?
The justices considered whether a judge must find that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole.
Who is most affected by the decision in Jones v. Mississippi?
Juveniles facing life without parole are directly affected. Judges in states with discretionary sentencing are affected too.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi?
The Supreme Court's work on this case is over. Lower courts will use the decision in future juvenile sentencing cases.
Decision
What the Court decided
A judge may sentence a juvenile to life without parole without first making a separate finding that the child is permanently incorrigible, if the sentence is discretionary.
Impact
This affects juveniles convicted of murder who face life without parole and the judges who sentence them. In discretionary sentencing systems, courts may impose that punishment without a separate finding of permanent incorrigibility.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 18-1259
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Apr 22, 2021
Petition
brief | Mar 29, 2019
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Feb 15, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026