Skip to main content

No. 18-1259October Term 2020Decided Apr 22, 2021

Docket 18-1259October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

Jones v. Mississippi

A judge may sentence a juvenile to life without parole without first making a separate finding that the child is permanently incorrigible, if the sentence is discretionary.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 22, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedApr 22, 2021
What it's about

This case involved Brett Jones, who was 15 when he killed his grandfather and was later resentenced to life without parole after the Court’s juvenile sentencing decisions in Miller and Montgomery. The Supreme Court considered whether the Constitution requires a judge to make a separate finding that a juvenile offender is permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole.

Question presented

Whether the Eighth Amendment requires the sentencing authority to make a finding that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a sentence of life without parole.

Case path

Court of Appeals of Mississippi / Decision released Apr 22, 2021

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The case asked whether the Eighth Amendment requires a judge to make a separate finding that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole. The Court said no, so long as the sentence is not mandatory and the sentencer has discretion to impose a lesser punishment.

Impact

This affects juveniles convicted of murder who face life without parole and the judges who sentence them. In discretionary sentencing systems, courts may impose that punishment without a separate finding of permanent incorrigibility.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this case. Lower courts and sentencing judges will apply this rule in future juvenile life-without-parole cases.

What was the main dispute in Jones v. Mississippi?

The justices considered whether a judge must find that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole.

Who is most affected by the decision in Jones v. Mississippi?

Juveniles facing life without parole are directly affected. Judges in states with discretionary sentencing are affected too.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi?

The Supreme Court's work on this case is over. Lower courts will use the decision in future juvenile sentencing cases.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

A judge may sentence a juvenile to life without parole without first making a separate finding that the child is permanently incorrigible, if the sentence is discretionary.

Impact

This affects juveniles convicted of murder who face life without parole and the judges who sentence them. In discretionary sentencing systems, courts may impose that punishment without a separate finding of permanent incorrigibility.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents