Skip to main content

No. 18-1195October Term 2019Decided Jun 30, 2020

Docket 18-1195October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue

At its core, the case asked whether a state may cut religious schools out of a neutral student-aid program just because they are religious.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 30, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 30, 2020
What it's about

This case was about Montana’s tax-credit scholarship program for private school tuition and the state’s decision to bar families from using those scholarships at religious schools. The parents argued that excluding religious schools, and then striking down the whole program because religious schools might benefit, unlawfully discriminated against religion.

Question presented

Does it violate the Religion Clauses or Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools?

Case path

Supreme Court of Montana / Decision released Jun 30, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

This case was about Montana's tax-credit scholarship program for private school tuition and the state's decision to block families from using scholarships at religious schools. The Supreme Court resolved that dispute after parents argued the exclusion, and the end of the whole program because religious schools might benefit, discriminated against religion.

Impact

The case affects families who want to use student aid at religious schools and states that run school-choice programs. For example, it matters to parents seeking tuition help for a child to attend a religious private school.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Montana and any affected lower courts or officials must follow the decision in future disputes over the program.

What was the main fight in Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue?

Parents challenged Montana's rule blocking scholarship use at religious schools. They said excluding those schools, and ending the program because they might benefit, was religious discrimination.

Who could feel the real-world effects of this case?

Families seeking tuition help for private religious schools could be directly affected. State lawmakers and education officials also may need to rethink how scholarship programs are written.

What happens procedurally now that the Supreme Court has acted?

The Supreme Court's work on this case is over. State officials and lower courts must apply the decision as related disputes arise.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

At its core, the case asked whether a state may cut religious schools out of a neutral student-aid program just because they are religious.

Impact

The case affects families who want to use student aid at religious schools and states that run school-choice programs. For example, it matters to parents seeking tuition help for a child to attend a religious private school.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents