Skip to main content

No. 17-965October Term 2017Decided Jun 26, 2018

Docket 17-965October Term 2017 (2017–2018)

Trump v. Hawaii

The Supreme Court finished the case after deciding the challenge to the travel-ban proclamation.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 26, 2018
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 26, 2018
What it's about

This case was about President Trump’s 2017 proclamation restricting entry into the United States for certain people from several countries after a government security review. The Court considered whether this “travel ban” was authorized by federal immigration law and whether it violated the Constitution by targeting Muslims.

Question presented

1. Whether respondents' challenge to the President's suspension of entry of aliens abroad is justiciable. 2. Whether the Proclamation is a lawful exercise of the President's authority to suspend entry of aliens abroad. 3. Whether the global injunction is impermissibly overbroad. 4. Whether Proclamation No. 9645 violates the Establishment Clause.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jun 26, 2018

Area

First Amendment, Immigration

Briefing

What it's about

This case asked whether President Trump’s 2017 proclamation restricting entry into the United States for certain people from several countries was allowed by federal immigration law and the Constitution. The Supreme Court issued a decision on June 26, 2018, resolving that challenge.

Impact

The case shaped how much power a president has to limit entry into the country for security reasons. For example, a person from one of the covered countries seeking to enter the United States could be affected directly by the proclamation.

What's next

The Court has finished this docket action. The practical next step was for the government and lower courts to apply the Supreme Court’s decision.

What was the core dispute in Trump v. Hawaii?

The case asked whether the President could restrict entry for people from certain countries under federal immigration law. It also asked whether the policy unlawfully targeted Muslims.

What real-world consequences did Trump v. Hawaii have?

It affected people from the covered countries who wanted to enter the United States. The decision also mattered for future presidents using national-security reasons to limit entry.

What was the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Hawaii?

There was no new Supreme Court step listed after the June 26, 2018 decision. This docket action was complete.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court finished the case after deciding the challenge to the travel-ban proclamation.

Impact

The case shaped how much power a president has to limit entry into the country for security reasons. For example, a person from one of the covered countries seeking to enter the United States could be affected directly by the proclamation.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents