Skip to main content

No. 17-834October Term 2019Decided Mar 3, 2020

Docket 17-834October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Kansas v. Garcia

This case asked whether federal immigration law shuts down state identity-theft prosecutions tied to work-authorization paperwork.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Mar 3, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMar 3, 2020
What it's about

Kansas prosecuted several unauthorized workers for identity theft and related state crimes after they used other people’s Social Security numbers on job and tax forms. The case is about whether federal immigration law blocks states from bringing those prosecutions because the conduct overlaps with the federal employment-verification system.

Question presented

1. Whether IRCA expressly preempts the States from using any information entered on or appended to a federal Form I-9, including common information such as name, date of birth, and social security number, in a prosecution of any person (citizen or alien) when that same, commonly used information also appears in non-IRCA documents, such as state tax forms, leases, and credit applications. 2. Whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act impliedly preempts Kansas's prosecution of Respondents?

Case path

Supreme Court of Kansas / Decision released Mar 3, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court decided a fight over whether the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act blocks Kansas from prosecuting workers for identity theft and related state crimes when the same personal information also appeared on state tax and other nonfederal forms. The case grew out of Kansas prosecutions involving the use of other people's Social Security numbers on job and tax paperwork.

Vote

The case was argued on Oct. 16, 2019, and decided on March 3, 2020, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.

Impact

The Court's answer affects how much room states have to bring their own criminal cases when conduct overlaps with the federal employment-verification system. For example, it matters when a state prosecutor wants to charge identity theft based on a Social Security number used on tax and job documents.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this case. Kansas and lower courts must apply the Court's March 3, 2020 decision in this case and similar disputes.

What was the core dispute in Kansas v. Garcia?

The case asked whether federal immigration law blocks Kansas from prosecuting identity theft and related crimes tied to job and tax forms. The overlap with federal Form I-9 information was central.

Who is most affected by this case in the real world?

State prosecutors, workers accused of using another person's Social Security number, and employers are all affected. The decision shapes when state criminal charges can accompany immigration-related workplace conduct.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?

This Supreme Court docket is over. Kansas courts and other lower courts will use the decision when similar preemption disputes arise.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

This case asked whether federal immigration law shuts down state identity-theft prosecutions tied to work-authorization paperwork.

Impact

The Court's answer affects how much room states have to bring their own criminal cases when conduct overlaps with the federal employment-verification system. For example, it matters when a state prosecutor wants to charge identity theft based on a Social Security number used on tax and job documents.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents