CNH Industrial N.V., et al., Petitioners v. Jack Reese, et al.

Whether the Sixth Circuit’s decision is consistent with M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, 135 S. Ct. 926 (2015) when it held, for the third time, that CNH contracted to provide vested lifetime retiree healthcare benefits to the Class, applying ordinary contract principles to the contractual language, finding at least an ambiguity as to vesting, and giving effect to the undisputed and extensive extrinsic evidence and admissions that the parties intended to vest the benefits.