No. 17-494October Term 2017Decided Jun 21, 2018
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.
South Dakota v. Wayfair was a major Supreme Court fight over whether the Constitution still required a seller's physical presence before a state could be required to collect sales tax.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 21, 2018
- What it's about
This case asked whether South Dakota could require large online and other out-of-state sellers with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit state sales tax. The dispute centered on whether the Constitution’s dormant Commerce Clause still required a seller to be physically present in a state before the state could impose that tax-collection duty.
Question presented
Should this Court abrogate Quill's sales-tax-only, physical-presence requirement?
- Case path
Supreme Court of South Dakota / Decision released Jun 21, 2018
- Area
Business and Regulation
Briefing
What it's about
The case asked whether South Dakota could require large online and other out-of-state sellers with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit state sales tax. The Supreme Court decided that question on June 21, 2018.
Vote
The Court decided the case on June 21, 2018, after hearing argument on April 17, 2018, but the prompt does not provide the vote or opinion lineup.
Impact
The answer affects state revenue and how online sellers do business. For example, a large web retailer shipping many orders into South Dakota could face tax-collection duties, while states could gain money for local services.
What's next
The Court has finished this docket action. The practical next step is for South Dakota and affected sellers to apply the Court's decision in tax collection and compliance.
What was the main question in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.?
The Court was asked whether it should scrap Quill's physical-presence rule for state sales-tax collection. The issue centered on remote sellers with no in-state location.
Who could feel the effects of this case in everyday life?
Large online sellers and states that rely on sales-tax revenue are the clearest examples. A retailer shipping many orders into South Dakota might need systems to collect tax.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's action here?
The Supreme Court's docket work is over. Any remaining work involves implementing the decision in South Dakota and by the businesses covered.
Decision
What the Court decided
South Dakota v. Wayfair was a major Supreme Court fight over whether the Constitution still required a seller's physical presence before a state could be required to collect sales tax.
Impact
The answer affects state revenue and how online sellers do business. For example, a large web retailer shipping many orders into South Dakota could face tax-collection duties, while states could gain money for local services.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 17-494
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 25, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jun 21, 2018
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026