Skip to main content

No. 17-387October Term 2017Decided May 21, 2018

Docket 17-387October Term 2017 (2017–2018)

Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren

At bottom, the case asked whether tribal sovereign immunity blocks a state-court case over who owns a disputed acre of land.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 21, 2018
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 21, 2018
What it's about

This case arose from a boundary dispute between the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and neighboring landowners in Washington after the Tribe claimed that about one acre on the neighbors’ side of a fence actually belonged to it. The Supreme Court considered whether the neighbors’ quiet title suit could go forward in state court despite the Tribe’s claim of sovereign immunity.

Question presented

Does a court's exercise of in rem jurisdiction overcome the jurisdictional bar of tribal sovereign immunity when the tribe has not waived immunity and Congress has not unequivocally abrogated it?

Case path

Supreme Court of Washington / Decision released May 21, 2018

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

Upper Skagit Tribe and neighboring landowners fought over about one acre on the far side of a fence in Washington. On May 21, 2018, the Supreme Court decided the case about whether the neighbors' land-ownership suit could go forward in state court despite the Tribe's sovereign immunity.

Impact

The answer affects whether tribes can be sued in state court over land boundaries when they have not agreed to be sued. That matters for tribes, nearby property owners, and anyone trying to settle a disputed property line.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any remaining boundary or title issues would have to continue, if at all, outside the Supreme Court based on that decision.

What was the main fight in Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren?

The Tribe and neighboring owners disagreed over about one acre across a fence. The Court examined whether the neighbors' ownership case could continue despite tribal immunity.

Why does this case matter beyond one acre in Washington?

The outcome affects tribes and adjoining landowners in boundary fights. It also shapes when state courts can hear land-title disputes involving tribal land.

What happens after the Supreme Court's May 21, 2018 decision?

The Supreme Court's docket is finished. Any remaining title or boundary issues would continue, if at all, outside the Supreme Court.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

At bottom, the case asked whether tribal sovereign immunity blocks a state-court case over who owns a disputed acre of land.

Impact

The answer affects whether tribes can be sued in state court over land boundaries when they have not agreed to be sued. That matters for tribes, nearby property owners, and anyone trying to settle a disputed property line.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents