Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren
In brief
Tribal sovereign immunity applies in lawsuits seeking to determine rights to property.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 7-2 · May 21, 2018 · Opinion by Chief Justice Roberts
- What it’s about
- The Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and Sharline and Ray Lundgren disputed ownership of a strip of land between their adjacent Washington properties.
- Who it affects
- The decision affects tribes and neighboring property owners facing boundary disputes. For example, a landowner seeking to clear title to disputed land may face tribal sovereign immunity in state court.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Supreme Court wiped out the Washington Supreme Court’s judgment and sent the case back (vacated and remanded), saying an earlier tax case did not decide whether tribal sovereign immunity applies in lawsuits over property.
The case involved tribal sovereign immunity and interpretation of the Indian General Allotment Act of 1887.
Question presented
Does a court's exercise of in rem jurisdiction overcome the jurisdictional bar of tribal sovereign immunity when the tribe has not waived immunity and Congress has not unequivocally abrogated it?
What the Court decided
Holding
Yakima addressed not the scope of tribal sovereign immunity, but a question of statutory interpretation of the Indian General Allotment Act of 1887. That Act authorized the President to allot parcels of reservation land to individual tribal members and directed the United States eventually to issue fee patents to the allottees as private individuals. In 1934, Congress reversed course but made no attempt to withdraw the lands already conveyed. As a result, Indian reservations sometimes contain both trust land held by the United States and fee-patented land held by private parties. Yakima concerned the tax consequences of this intermixture. 187 Wash. 2d 857, 389 P. 3d 569, vacated and remanded.
- Result
- Vacated
The vote
What's next
The Court has finished this docket action. The parties must follow the decision in any further proceedings over the disputed land.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Show 5 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
Opinion added: opinion
Brief added: Questions Presented
More questions
- What did the Supreme Court rule in Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren?
- The Court decided that Indian tribes have sovereign immunity in in rem lawsuits involving rights to property.
- Who is affected by the Upper Skagit Tribe decision?
- Tribes and neighboring landowners may be affected when they dispute a boundary or ownership of land. State-court property claims can raise tribal immunity questions.
- What happens next in Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren?
- The Supreme Court has finished its action in the case. Any further land dispute proceedings must follow the Court's decision.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.