Skip to main content

Besinek v. Lamone

Updated Sep 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the District Court's order in Besinek v. Lamone.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 18, 2018 · Per curiam

What it’s about
Republican Maryland voters alleged that state officials weakened their votes through partisan redistricting because they supported Republican candidates.
Who it affects
The ruling left the District Court's order in place. It did not separately state a broader rule resolving every First Amendment claim against partisan gerrymandering.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Besinek v. Lamone
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed (agreed with) the denial of a preliminary injunction (temporary court order) without deciding the underlying retaliation claims.

The case concerned whether voters can challenge a congressional map as political retaliation under the First Amendment.

Question presented

1. Did the majority err in holding that, to establish an actual, concrete injury in a First Amendment retaliation challenge to a partisan gerrymander, a plaintiff must prove that the gerrymander has dictated and will continue to dictate the outcome of every election held in the district under the gerrymandered map? 2. Did the majority err in holding that the Mt. Healthy burden-shifting framework is inapplicable to First Amendment retaliation challenges to partisan gerrymanders? 3. Regardless of the applicable legal standards, did the majority err in holding that the present record does not permit a finding that the 2011 gerrymander was a but-for cause of the Democratic victories in the district in 2012, 2014, or 2016?

What the Court decided

Holding

The order of the District Court is Affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Roberts
  2. Alito
  3. Breyer
  4. Kagan
  5. Thomas
  6. Ginsburg
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Kennedy
  9. Gorsuch
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The Supreme Court has completed this docket action. The District Court's order remains in effect.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Jul 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Jun 18, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What was challenged in Besinek v. Lamone?
Republican voters challenged Maryland's 2011 redesign of the Sixth Congressional District. They said officials drew the map to punish Republican political support.
How did the Supreme Court rule in Besinek v. Lamone?
The Court upheld the District Court's order (affirmed). All nine justices signed on to the unsigned opinion.
What did the ruling leave unresolved?
The Court's action did not separately announce a broad answer to every First Amendment challenge to partisan gerrymandering. It upheld this District Court order.
What happens next in Besinek v. Lamone?
The Supreme Court has finished its action in this docket. The District Court's order stays in effect.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis