No. 17-21October Term 2017Decided Jun 18, 2018
Lozman v. Riviera Beach
The Supreme Court finished this case after deciding how a retaliatory-arrest claim fits with the existence of probable cause.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 18, 2018
- What it's about
This case concerns a Florida man who says the City of Riviera Beach had him arrested at a city council meeting to punish him for criticizing city officials and suing the city. The Supreme Court considered whether his First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim could go forward even though there was probable cause for the arrest.
Question presented
Does the existence of probable cause defeat a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim as a matter of law?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Decision released Jun 18, 2018
- Area
First Amendment
Briefing
What it's about
A Florida man, Fane Lozman, said the City of Riviera Beach had him arrested at a city council meeting to punish him for criticizing city officials and suing the city. On June 18, 2018, the Supreme Court decided the case about whether a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim could go forward even though there was probable cause for the arrest.
Impact
The case affects people who say local officials used an arrest to punish protected speech, such as criticism at a public meeting. It also matters to cities and police because it addresses whether probable cause automatically blocks that kind of First Amendment claim.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further proceedings, if needed, would take place in the lower courts under the Supreme Court's decision.
What was the core dispute in Lozman v. Riviera Beach?
Lozman said city officials had him arrested at a council meeting to punish his criticism and lawsuit against the city. The legal fight was whether probable cause automatically defeated that First Amendment claim.
Why does this case matter in the real world?
It matters for residents who speak out at public meetings and later say officials retaliated against them. It also affects how cities and police defend arrests tied to speech disputes.
What was the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's June 18, 2018 decision?
The Supreme Court's work on this docket action was over. Any remaining action would happen in the lower courts using the Supreme Court's decision as the guide.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Supreme Court finished this case after deciding how a retaliatory-arrest claim fits with the existence of probable cause.
Impact
The case affects people who say local officials used an arrest to punish protected speech, such as criticism at a public meeting. It also matters to cities and police because it addresses whether probable cause automatically blocks that kind of First Amendment claim.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 17-21
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jun 18, 2018
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026