Skip to main content

No. 17-21October Term 2017Decided Jun 18, 2018

Docket 17-21October Term 2017 (2017–2018)

Lozman v. Riviera Beach

The Supreme Court finished this case after deciding how a retaliatory-arrest claim fits with the existence of probable cause.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 18, 2018
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 18, 2018
What it's about

This case concerns a Florida man who says the City of Riviera Beach had him arrested at a city council meeting to punish him for criticizing city officials and suing the city. The Supreme Court considered whether his First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim could go forward even though there was probable cause for the arrest.

Question presented

Does the existence of probable cause defeat a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim as a matter of law?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Decision released Jun 18, 2018

Area

First Amendment

Briefing

What it's about

A Florida man, Fane Lozman, said the City of Riviera Beach had him arrested at a city council meeting to punish him for criticizing city officials and suing the city. On June 18, 2018, the Supreme Court decided the case about whether a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim could go forward even though there was probable cause for the arrest.

Impact

The case affects people who say local officials used an arrest to punish protected speech, such as criticism at a public meeting. It also matters to cities and police because it addresses whether probable cause automatically blocks that kind of First Amendment claim.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further proceedings, if needed, would take place in the lower courts under the Supreme Court's decision.

What was the core dispute in Lozman v. Riviera Beach?

Lozman said city officials had him arrested at a council meeting to punish his criticism and lawsuit against the city. The legal fight was whether probable cause automatically defeated that First Amendment claim.

Why does this case matter in the real world?

It matters for residents who speak out at public meetings and later say officials retaliated against them. It also affects how cities and police defend arrests tied to speech disputes.

What was the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's June 18, 2018 decision?

The Supreme Court's work on this docket action was over. Any remaining action would happen in the lower courts using the Supreme Court's decision as the guide.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court finished this case after deciding how a retaliatory-arrest claim fits with the existence of probable cause.

Impact

The case affects people who say local officials used an arrest to punish protected speech, such as criticism at a public meeting. It also matters to cities and police because it addresses whether probable cause automatically blocks that kind of First Amendment claim.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents