Skip to main content

Bostock v. Clayton County

Updated Sep 19, 2026

In brief

Employers covered by Title VII cannot fire workers simply for being gay or transgender.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · June 15, 2020 · Opinion by Justice Gorsuch

What it’s about
The Supreme Court decided that Title VII, a federal employment law, bars an employer from firing someone merely for being gay or transgender because that is discrimination “because of sex.”
Who it affects
The Court decided that an employer violates Title VII by firing someone merely for being gay or transgender. That makes sexual-orientation and transgender-status discrimination a form of prohibited sex discrimination under this law.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Bostock v. Clayton County
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

In Bostock’s case against Clayton County, the Court overturned the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back for further proceedings (reversed and remanded); it separately upheld judgments in two companion cases.

The decision interpreted the word “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act's workplace-discrimination ban.

Question presented

Whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes prohibited employment discrimination "because of... sex" within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42U.S.C. § 2000e-2.

What the Court decided

Holding

An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII. 964, reversed and remanded

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Ginsburg
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Roberts
  6. Gorsuchwrote the opinion
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Thomas
  2. Kavanaughwrote a dissent
  3. Alitowrote a dissent
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

From the opinions

“There is only one word for what the Court has done today: legislation.”

— Justice Samuel Alito(dissent)

What's next

The Court sent Bostock's case back to the lower court (remanded) for further proceedings consistent with its ruling. The Supreme Court has finished its work on this docket.

Documents

3

Docket activity

11
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 6 more
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Jul 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jun 15, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    May 25, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What did Bostock v. Clayton County decide?
The Court decided that firing a worker merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII's ban on sex discrimination.
Who won Bostock v. Clayton County?
Bostock won at the Supreme Court. The Court overturned the Eleventh Circuit's ruling against him and sent the case back.
How did the justices vote in Bostock?
The Court ruled 6-3. Justice Gorsuch wrote the opinion, while Justices Alito and Kavanaugh wrote separate dissents.
What happens next in Bostock's case?
The case returned to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's decision.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis