No. 17-1618October Term 2019Decided Jun 15, 2020
Bostock v. Clayton County
Federal law bars employers covered by Title VII from firing workers merely for being gay, and the Court's combined decision also covered transgender workers.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 15, 2020
- What it's about
This case asked whether federal employment law protects a worker who says he was fired for being gay. Gerald Bostock claimed Clayton County unlawfully fired him because of his sexual orientation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Question presented
Whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes prohibited employment discrimination "because of... sex" within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42U.S.C. § 2000e-2.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Decision released Jun 15, 2020
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
Gerald Bostock said Clayton County fired him for being gay, which he argued was sex discrimination banned by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court said that an employer who fires someone merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII.
Vote
On June 15, 2020, the Court said Title VII bars employers from firing someone merely for being gay or transgender, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.
Impact
The decision means federal employment law protects workers from being fired for being gay or transgender. For example, a county worker or private employee can use Title VII if they say they lost a job for that reason.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this case. Employers and lower courts must now apply this reading of Title VII in future workplace discrimination disputes.
What was the central legal fight in Bostock v. Clayton County?
The case asked whether firing a worker for being gay counts as discrimination because of sex under Title VII. Bostock said it does; Clayton County said it does not.
How does the decision affect workers in real life?
It gives employees a federal protection against being fired for being gay or transgender. That matters to workers in government jobs and private workplaces covered by Title VII.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock?
The Supreme Court's role is over. Lower courts and employers must follow the decision when handling Title VII workplace discrimination claims.
Decision
What the Court decided
Federal law bars employers covered by Title VII from firing workers merely for being gay, and the Court's combined decision also covered transgender workers.
Impact
The decision means federal employment law protects workers from being fired for being gay or transgender. For example, a county worker or private employee can use Title VII if they say they lost a job for that reason.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 17-1618
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jun 15, 2020
Petition
brief | May 25, 2018
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026