Public employee union fees
Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association
In brief
The Supreme Court’s tie left the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in place but did not settle the First Amendment questions.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · March 29, 2016 · Per curiam
- What it’s about
- Rebecca Friedrichs and other California public school teachers challenged rules allowing unions to collect fees from nonmembers and requiring employees to opt out of paying for certain union speech.
- Who it affects
- The Ninth Circuit’s judgment remains in place in this case, but the Supreme Court did not decide whether the challenged fee and opt-out rules violate the First Amendment.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The Supreme Court split evenly and left the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in place, without resolving the First Amendment questions.
The dispute centered on fees charged to public employees who did not join a union and how they could avoid paying for certain union speech.
Question presented
1. Do public-sector agency shop arrangements violate the First Amendment’s protections for freedom of speech and assembly? 2. Does the First Amendment prohibit the practice of requiring public employees to affirmatively opt-out of subsidizing nonchargeable speech rather than to affirmatively consent?
What the Court decided
Holding
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
- Result
- Affirmed
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished reviewing the case. Its action left the Ninth Circuit judgment in place rather than sending the case back for more proceedings.
Documents
Opinions
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Show 4 moreShow fewer
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Opinion added: Friedrichs
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.