Skip to main content

Doretha H. Henderson, Authorized Representative of David L. Henderson v. Shinseki

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Court overturned the Federal Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back (remanded), finding that the deadline did not take away the Veterans Court’s authority to hear the appeal.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · March 1, 2011 · Opinion by Justice Alito

What it’s about
David Henderson appealed to the Veterans Court after the deadline for challenging a denial of veterans benefits, and the Federal Circuit said the late filing deprived that court of authority to hear his appeal.
Who it affects
Missing this deadline does not by itself take away the Veterans Court’s power to hear an appeal.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Doretha H. Henderson, Authorized Representative of David L. Henderson v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled the deadline did not automatically bar the appeal on that basis, overturned the Federal Circuit’s ruling, and sent the case back to that court (remanded).

The appeal challenged a denial of David Henderson’s veterans-benefits claim.

The dispute concerned the time limit for asking the Veterans Court to review a VA benefits decision.

Question presented

Is the time limit in 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) subject to equitable tolling?

What the Court decided

Holding

The deadline for filing a notice of appeal with the Veterans Court does not have jurisdictional consequences. 589 F. 3d 1201, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

Majority author
Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

What's next

The Federal Circuit must reconsider the case without treating the missed deadline as a limit on the Veterans Court’s authority.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Shinseki

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Shinseki

    Mar 1, 2011 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis