Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

October 2024 oral arguments

9 cases across 5 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Five argument days, October 7 to October 16, 2024. Four of them have more than one case.

2 cases
Nancy Williams, et al., Petitioners v. Greg Reed, Secretary, Alabama Department of WorkforceDoes a Section 1983 claim brought in state court require the plaintiffs to first exhaust state administrative remedies?Decided 23-191Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Anastasia Wullschleger, et al.Can a plaintiff whose state-court lawsuit has been removed by the defendants to federal court seek to have the case sent back to state court by amending the complaint to omit all references to federal law?Decided 23-677

2 cases
Gerald F. Lackey, in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, Petitioner v. Damian Stinnie, et al.Is a party who obtains a preliminary injunction a “prevailing party” for purposes of being entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C § 1988?Decided 23-621Pamela Bondi, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners v. Jennifer VanDerStok, et al.Did the ATF exceed its statutory authority in promulgating its Final Rule purporting to regulate so-called “ghost guns”?Decided 23-852

1 case
Richard Eugene Glossip, Petitioner v. OklahomaWhether the state's failure to disclose this evidence violated the defendant's due process rights.Decided 22-7466

2 cases
Medical Marijuana, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Douglas J. HornAre economic harms resulting from personal injuries properly considered injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act?Decided 23-365Amina Bouarfa, Petitioner v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.May a visa petitioner obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria?Decided 23-583

2 cases
Joshua E. Bufkin, Petitioner v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans AffairsMust the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1)?Decided 23-713City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection AgencyDoes the Clean Water Act allow the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform?Decided 23-753