No. 23-753October Term 2024Decided Mar 4, 2025
City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency
The Supreme Court ruled that the Clean Water Act does not authorize the EPA to include generic "end-result" provisions in wastewater discharge permits that hold permittees liable for water quality standards without specifying the concrete limits they must meet.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Mar 4, 2025
- What it's about
The Supreme Court ruled that the Clean Water Act does not authorize the EPA to include generic "end-result" provisions in wastewater discharge permits that hold permittees liable for water quality standards without specifying the concrete limits they must meet. The decision reversed a lower court ruling, emphasizing that the EPA must define specific compliance measures rather than forcing permit holders to determine how to achieve broad water quality goals.
Question presented
Does the Clean Water Act allow the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Mar 4, 2025
- Area
Administrative Law
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 23-753
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Mar 30, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
opinion
opinion | Mar 4, 2025
Opinion
opinion | Mar 4, 2025
Oral Arguments - San Francisco v. EPA
audio | Oct 16, 2024
Petition
brief | Jan 8, 2024