Cases compared
Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar Association vs. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Petitioner v. Sean O'Day, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services vs. Breanna Renteria, et al., Petitioners v. New Mexico Office of the Superintendent of Insurance, et al.
First Amendment cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.
No. 25-1002No. 25-1018No. 25-113
Side by side
| Fact | Rajeh A. Saadeh, Petitioner v. New Jersey State Bar Association | Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Petitioner v. Sean O'Day, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services | Breanna Renteria, et al., Petitioners v. New Mexico Office of the Superintendent of Insurance, et al. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docket | 25-1002 | 25-1018 | 25-113 |
| Status | Before Arguments | Before Arguments | Before Arguments |
| Date | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) |
| Question presented | Whether the First Amendment overrides antidiscrimination laws when the discrimination furthers the defendant’s views about “diversity,” “equity,” or “inclusion”? | 1. When a state law requires a pharmaceutical company to file reports with the government disclosing information about drug pricing, does that law violate the company’s right to free speech? 2. When a state law permits disclosure of trade secrets reported to a state regulatory body if that disclosure is in the public interest, is that law facially invalid under this Court’s precedent expressly permitting the disclosure of trade secrets in some circumstances? | 1. Whether, under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, New Mexico’s state insurance code is neutral and generally applicable under Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). 2. Whether New Mexico’s application of the state insurance code to petitioners’ health care sharing ministry is preempted by federal law. |
| Summary | Rajeh Saadeh challenges the New Jersey State Bar Association’s practice of reserving certain leadership positions for members of specified minority groups. He argues that the set-asides violate New Jersey’s antidiscrimination law, while the association contends that they are protected expressive activity under the First Amendment. | Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America challenges an Oregon law requiring drugmakers to submit and publicly disclose reports explaining certain drug-price increases, including information the group says may contain trade secrets. The petition argues that the law violates the First Amendment by compelling speech and the Fifth Amendment by allowing publication of confidential business information without compensation. | Two members of a Christian health care sharing ministry challenge New Mexico’s order requiring the ministry to stop operating in the state or comply with the state insurance code. They argue that applying the insurance code would effectively shut down the ministry and conflicts with federal Affordable Care Act protections for health care sharing ministries and their religious practices. |
Relationship
- Shared issue
- First Amendment
- Why compared
- Reviewed First Amendment tags connect these current-term public cases.
Related
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.