Cases compared
National Small Business United, dba National Small Business Association v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury vs. Kevin Isaac Montoya Palacios v. Vernon Liggins, Acting Field Office Director, Baltimore, Maryland, Immigration and Customs Enforcement vs. Texas Top Cop Shop, Incorporated v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General
Criminal Procedure cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.
No. 25-1201No. 25-1223No. 25-1290
Side by side
| Fact | National Small Business United, dba National Small Business Association v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury | Kevin Isaac Montoya Palacios v. Vernon Liggins, Acting Field Office Director, Baltimore, Maryland, Immigration and Customs Enforcement | Texas Top Cop Shop, Incorporated v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docket | 25-1201 | 25-1223 | 25-1290 |
| Status | Before Arguments | Before Arguments | Before Arguments |
| Date | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) |
| Question presented | 1. Whether the reporting requirements exceed Congress’s enumerated powers on their face. 2. Whether the reporting requirements violate the Fourth Amendment on their face. | Whether, under EAJA, "any civil action" encompasses an action seeking a writ of habeas corpus to challenge civil immigration detention? | 1. Whether the Act’s regulation of corporations merely because they exist under state law exceeds Congress’s Commerce Clause authority. 2. Whether the Act’s suspicionless and warrantless searches to further a generalized interest in expedient law enforcement violate the Fourth Amendment. |
| Summary | This case challenges the Corporate Transparency Act, which requires many state-created companies to report information about their beneficial owners to the federal government. The petitioners argue that Congress exceeded its Commerce Clause power by imposing the reporting requirement on companies based solely on their existence under state law; the Eleventh Circuit upheld the law. | This case asks whether a person who wins a habeas corpus challenge to civil immigration detention may recover attorney’s fees and costs from the federal government under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Court will decide whether such a habeas case counts as a “civil action” under that law. | This case challenges the Corporate Transparency Act, which requires many corporations to report identifying information about their beneficial owners to the federal government. The petitioners argue that Congress lacked constitutional authority to impose the reporting requirement and that the required disclosure is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. |
Relationship
- Shared issue
- Criminal Procedure
- Why compared
- Reviewed Criminal Procedure tags connect these current-term public cases.
Related
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.