Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case Tracker

Cases compared

Hastings College Conservation Committee v. California vs. Nexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLC vs. John H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware Corporation

Business and Regulation cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

No. 25-1231No. 25-1243No. 25-1264

Side by side

Hastings College Conservation Committee v. California vs. Nexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLC vs. John H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware Corporation, compared fact by fact
FactHastings College Conservation Committee v. CaliforniaNexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLCJohn H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware Corporation
DocketHastings College Conservation Committee v. California25-1231Nexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLC25-1243John H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware Corporation25-1264
StatusHastings College Conservation Committee v. CaliforniaBefore ArgumentsNexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLCBefore ArgumentsJohn H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware CorporationDismissed
DateHastings College Conservation Committee v. CaliforniaOctober Term 2025 (2025–2026)Nexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLCOctober Term 2025 (2025–2026)John H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware CorporationOctober Term 2025 (2025–2026)
Question presentedHastings College Conservation Committee v. California1. Whether a state law that requires a specified name and governance structure for a public college and is enacted in exchange for payment of a specified sum creates binding contractual obligations on the part of that state subject to the protections of the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution. 2. Whether state legislation posthumously declaring an individual as having engaged in criminal conduct and, on that basis, stripping benefits secured by state law for that individual and his descendants violates the Bill of Attainder Clause of the U.S. Constitution.Nexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLCWhether a plaintiff has antitrust standing to recover purported downstream losses flowing from its decision not to purchase an allegedly price-fixed product?John H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware Corporation1. Whether a civil jury may determine the scientific validity, biochemical identity, or physiological efficacy of a patented compound — and impose nationwide prohibitions on its labeling and promotion — in the absence of any regulatory action by the Food and Drug Administration, thereby substituting judicial verdicts for Federal scientific oversight in violation of due process and the separation of powers? 2. Whether a court violates due process by excluding critical, reliable defense evidence that goes to falsity, materiality, and affirmative defenses in a Lanham Act action — thereby preventing a defendant from presenting a complete defense? 3. Whether a court violates federal antitrust law and due process by permitting litigation to proceed where the suit is objectively baseless and brought as a competitive weapon to destroy a rival, thereby stripping it of Noerr-Pennington immunity under the sham-litigation doctrine? 4. May a lay jury impose the largest civil penalty in the history of the Lanham act based on admitted guesswork and standardless damages determinations, in Violation of a Court Order prohibiting speculation, without violating due process, where the verdict operates as punishment and de facto regulatory action rather than compensation for proven harm?
SummaryHastings College Conservation Committee v. CaliforniaThis pending case challenges a 2022 California law that renamed Hastings College of the Law and ended a board seat reserved for the heirs of its founder, Serranus Clinton Hastings. The petitioners argue that California broke binding commitments made in an 1878 law in exchange for Hastings’s $100,000 payment and unconstitutionally punished him and his descendants through legislation.Nexstar Media Group, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLCNexstar Media Group asks the Supreme Court to review a Second Circuit ruling that allowed DirecTV to seek antitrust damages for claimed lost downstream revenue after it chose not to buy allegedly price-fixed television programming. The case concerns whether a business that did not purchase the allegedly overpriced product can nevertheless show the direct, non-speculative injury required for antitrust standing.John H. Owoc, aka Jack Owoc v. Monster Energy Company, a Delaware CorporationJohn “Jack” Owoc has asked the Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit case involving Monster Energy. His petition raises challenges to a civil verdict and litigation over claims about a patented compound, including whether courts may resolve scientific and labeling issues without FDA action, whether defense evidence was wrongly excluded, and whether the suit was improper anticompetitive litigation.

Relationship

Shared issue
Business and Regulation
Why compared
Reviewed Business and Regulation tags connect these current-term public cases.

Related

Sources

  • Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.